For the love of all that's holy, take pity upon all the colorblind people here. That map is unreadable.
Autism
A community for respectful discussion and memes related to autism acceptance. All neurotypes are welcome.
Community:
Values
- Acceptance
- Openness
- Understanding
- Equality
- Reciprocity
- Mutuality
- Love
Rules
- No abusive, derogatory, or offensive post/comments e.g: racism, sexism, religious hatred, homophobia, gatekeeping, trolling.
- Posts must be related to autism, off-topic discussions happen in the matrix chat.
- Your posts must include a text body. It doesn't have to be long, it just needs to be descriptive.
- Do not request donations.
- Be respectful in discussions.
- Do not post misinformation.
- Mark NSFW content accordingly.
- Do not promote Autism Speaks.
- General Lemmy World rules.
Encouraged
- Open acceptance of all autism levels as a respectable neurotype.
- Funny memes.
- Respectful venting.
- Describe posts of pictures/memes using text in the body for our visually impaired users.
- Welcoming and accepting attitudes.
- Questions regarding autism.
- Questions on confusing situations.
- Seeking and sharing support.
- Engagement in our community's values.
- Expressing a difference of opinion without directly insulting another user.
- Please report questionable posts and let the mods deal with it. Chat Room
- We have a chat room! Want to engage in dialogue? Come join us at the community's Matrix Chat.
.
Helpful Resources
- Are you seeking education, support groups, and more? Take a look at our list of helpful resources.
Is this any better? I tried futzing around with it to see if I could adjust the colors to yellow and blue.
Much. You are awesome. Thank you!
Oh, so sorry! I didn’t create these graphics.
Lol its OK. Just threw me off, and I was cranky after a long meeting.
Source for who did?
504 gives dyslexics accommodations in schools among its many functions. These bastards suck.
First off, not autistic, hope this allowed. Is 504 how IEPs gain legal backing?
Teacher who had a 504 here: no, IEPs are covered under the Americans with Disabilities Act, while 504s are under the rehabilitation act. Most importantly, though, 504s are how you get specific, enforceable accommodations for:
- eyesight difficulties, including colorblindness
- medical conditions which require that you receive special privileges (unlimited restroom use, nurse access, specific seating/accessibility requirements)
- Dyslexia, Dysgraphia & Dyscalculia
- and SO much more
- most importantly, protections against revealing such disabilities or retaliation against accommodation.
Thanks for the answer. I had an IEP that changed my life. It involved access to a computer (back when that was a big ask) due to a condition that involved some hand issues. I went from remedial classes to advanced once I could get it down. I'm now a biochemist.
The specifics are helpful to explain to other people "yeah, THAT is going away".
What are these? Are they from an informational site I can direct to?
I have another comment on this post which may be helpful for you. TLDR Biden's Admin had tried to protect trans people under the ADA via executive agency. Likely outcome is that will be reversed but the ADA (and similar or related protections) & IMO will not see broader impacts. This is because the law that passed Congress and was sign by the president specifically didn't include trans people when it was signed (along with a number of other peoples most trans people would be offended to be grouped with).
Tldr tldr: this likely stops trans people from being in the ADA's protection.
Not what I was asking, sorry, though thank you for the info. Did you make these info graphics?
Nope just skimmed the complaint.
Full complaint is case 5:24-cv-00225-C filed in the US District Court Northern District of Texas.
It seems that the heart of the lawsuit is that the Biden Admin tried to get gender dysphoria to be a disability under the Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and ADA by means of administrative rule making. The text of both of those laws as written *by Congress and signed by the Executive have clauses stating they do not encompass trans people. (Cites are in line 2 of complaint)
I'd wager the constitutional argument on the spending power is to preserve another option for appeal. Realistically I think they'll probably win and get the Final Rule held to be a violation of the APA and struck down without the rest of Section 504 being touched. Their constitutional argument boils down to if the Final Rule isn't violating the law the law is too vague to be enforceable.
*Edit