this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2025
85 points (97.8% liked)

Asklemmy

44978 readers
1247 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 days ago (6 children)

If math is actually uncovering fundamental laws of the universe, rather than just describing it at various scales, then there's a chance we can rewrite reality with our own set of rules that would render the current ones incompatible (by GΓΆdel's-IT).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_universe_hypothesis

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Generica 5 points 3 days ago

There are more stars in the visible universe than there are grains of sand on all the beaches in the world.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Infinity and Black Hole

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago (4 children)

In chemistry I was taught one carbon atom can exist in at least 12 separate living bodies before it's no longer stable.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Hon I think you maybe misunderstood your chem class.

Carbon is carbon is carbon and doesn't know or care if it's in a living body.

Carbon-14 has a half life of 5700 years. This means that through random decay, the approximate rate of decay is one half of a given amount every 5700 years, this of course breaks down when you reach the single-digit quantities of atoms.

Now, this has nothing to do with the stability of an atom of regular-ass carbon-12, your common garden variety carbon, which is extremely stable and would require outside influence to decay into another isotope.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

As you established that is not true, however you can add some of that carbon from some body and add it to the iron from the blood of 400 other human bodies so you can forge one nice sword.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

Unrelated: Anyone want to hang out? I'm planning a party. Should be enough space for about 400 people.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Holy shit lol. This is amazing!!!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

that doesn't make any sense. Carbon doesn't get less stable by being used in bodies.

Carbon 14 exists, but that decays regardless if it's in a body or not. At has quite a long half life

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

At least is a heavy lifting qualifier in this case.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Yea, I misremembered it. It was in my book from a while back. Here we go:

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 days ago

After you die, the carbon atoms that made you might go on to make another living thing.

load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί