this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2025
182 points (72.6% liked)

Memes

46406 readers
2374 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 19 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

True but only for terminally online liberals. I still haven't heard anyone in real life ever use that word.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Authoritarianism is authoritarianism. Doesnt matter how you paint it.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

Not really, no. To a capitalist, all forms of leftism is 'authoritarian,' because they consider private property natural and oppose leftists 'stealing' in.

'Authoritarianism' just isn't a particularly useful term because nobody who uses is is ever actually categorically opposed to forcefully compelling people to do or not do things. They will always have a build in exception for what ever they consider to be 'legitimate authority', and what they consider justified authority will just depend on what political philosophy they ascribe to. So really calling the word just means "someone with a different political theory to me with regards to legitimate authority."

[–] [email protected] -2 points 5 hours ago

So you’re an author apologist. Got it.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Just because some people might not use the term correctly doesn’t mean it isn’t a useful term

I left lemmy.ml because there were too many people defending or denying historical acts of political violence. That’s what we mean when we say tankies are authoritarian.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 18 hours ago (22 children)

If you'd actually read my post, you'd know my point wasn't about it being used "incorrectly".

people defending or denying historical acts of political violence. That’s what we mean when we say tankies are authoritarian.

Defeating the Nazis was an act of political violence, freeing slaves was an act of political violence, over throwing the feudal system was an act of political believe, driving out colonial empires is an act of political violence, enforcing property rights is an act of political violence, ceasing the means of production is an act of political violence.

See? This is exactly, exactly what I was talking about.

load more comments (22 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 22 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 16 points 23 hours ago (6 children)

Tankie doesn't really mean anything to me anymore. Even self-proclaimed tankies often have trouble defining it in a way that is consistent among leftist groups.

[–] GrammarPolice 6 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Tankie = derogatory term for Marxist. It's that easy

[–] [email protected] -2 points 8 hours ago

No, and never was.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

I believe in reclaiming "tankie" in the same way as "queer." Schoolyard bullies don't really care to distinguish between the many different labels encompassed by LGBT+, and so they inadvertently invented a term that could be very inclusive and all encompassing, even if you're still figuring out who you are, you call always fall back on "queer" to give the general idea.

In the same way, the term "tankie" gets applied to people of all sorts of different left ideologies. There are significant differences between different leftist ideologies, but our critics don't care to understand or distinguish between them, so I consider tankie to be a similarly inclusive term. Do you support anything that any socialist government has ever done? Do you think Cuba had an effective literacy program? Congratulations, you're a tankie, welcome to the club.

Note that my identifying with the term isn't really an invitation for people to use it. But, you know, if people want to keep using it as this broad, meaningless term that lumps a bunch of people together, as I see it, it only works to our advantage as "tankies," it pushes people towards us and helps us remember what we have in common instead of fighting over our differences. So I'm not exactly going to fight the label particularly hard.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

-- and they both punch left; exactly as conservatives like to do.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago (15 children)

Do MLs consider anarchists liberals now?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 19 hours ago

No, but a lot of liberals consider themselves anarchists.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Truly. Any moderate support for AES? Immediately labeled a tankie, I've seen Anarchists and even Liberals labeled a tankie. The term only exists to punch left from the Liberal POV, just like "Woke" is used to punch anything left of fascism.

[–] qaz 3 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

What are you referring to with "AES"? (I only know it as an encryption method and Google ain't helping)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›