this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
18 points (90.9% liked)

Civil Aviation

307 readers
61 users here now

News from civil commercial and noncommercial aviation, videos, discussions, and more.

Basic rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No posts about military aviationAvoid any and all posts related to military aviation.
3. No meme postsNo meme posts. Those should go to [email protected].
4. Instance rules applyAll lemmy.zip instance rules listed in the sidebar will be enforced.

Icon attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @[email protected].

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Perhaps "privately developed" is a more accurate description than "civil"?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Huh, so not entirely private? Or publically funded and privately developed?

[–] merari42 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What about the Concorde? Government grants but technically done by private firms.

[–] merari42 9 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The difference that is significant is its quietness which the others were not

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Are you sure you aren't confusing the Boom XB-1 with the NASA X-59?