this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2025
60 points (84.9% liked)

Australia

3736 readers
194 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @[email protected] who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @[email protected] and @[email protected]

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 days ago

I think most people just want a day off man

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Considering the 'looseness' of the specific date, I find it odd that some cling so hard to it's significance, the feeling of having to change it seems to much to bear for some. It would possibly be better to use Federation day ( although that date is inconvenient for a public holiday) or another day chosen from a selection in a referendum or similar. While we stoke divisive fires this will never change. Personally change the date I can adapt and if it makes some happy what do I care, I just want the day off.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago (3 children)

It's not my guilt to carry. I wasn't born or wasn't involved in these racist acts. Blame the people who were

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What's the point of blaming dead generations? That doesn't achieve anything for society. Guilt doesn't fix things.

If my dad stole your car five years ago and I inherited it, I wasn't involved at all, but you still had your car stolen. Would it be fine for me to say "I'm not a thief, you should blame my dad" and keep driving it around?

Of course, a car is a trivial example. Seizing entire communities' land, kidnapping and massacring them, for starters, is obviously a bit harder to forget about after a few generations, because the consequences still impact people today.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How far back in time can you go to right wrongs? Everybody has ancestors who have done wrong. Indigenous Australians had wars before white people arrived.

At some point you have to leave the past in the past and build a more equitable world for all, today.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

At some point you have to leave the past in the past and build a more equitable world for all, today.

Yep.

Unfortunately, some people confuse equity with "just treat everyone the same, I don't need to do anything about the things my ancestors stole". That leaving the past in the past means ignoring its continuing impacts. As long as systematic disadvantage from stolen land and oppression is ongoing, it's not the past - it's the present.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

@DavidDoesLemmy @vividspecter Too sad you feel this way. I don't carry the guilt: but I am aware. And I am sympathetic.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (3 children)

No one is asking you to feel guilty. We're asking you to acknowledge the past, and to acknowledge the privilege that brings you. To use that to help forge a path of reconciliation forward together as a nation.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

I'm all for that. But I think many people feel more responsible for righting the wrongs of their ancestors than of other wrongs. I think we should help all those struggling, independent of who caused it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

To use that to help forge a path of reconciliation forward together as a nation.

Not having a go here, genuinely. I genuinely want to know: what does this mean? I voted yes, but it was a lot of vague comments and a voice to parliament all sounds great. but no ones ever said "here's 3 simple things we should be working on".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"here's 3 simple things we should be working on".

Three things to work on would be truth, treaty and voice? Those aren't simple though.

I think the nation accepting the voice would have been a step towards reconciliation, since it would have been a sign showing the nation accepts wrongs that exist in its history.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

no, they are buzz words that could apply to a number of things given different context. A list of actionable items makes things achievable. Voice is dead in the water, Murdoch and limp dicked support from the albo government saw to that. So what can we actually DO to help here.

Thats the part I never see articulated.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

They really aren't buzzwords, it's a short way of describing what the Uluru statement proposed. The issue is that the failure of the voice both encouraged the right wing to shit on indigenous issues and tell labor that it's not worth the political capital to touch you indigenous issues.

If you want concrete policy goals then you could look at the royal commission into aboriginal deaths in custody and email your MP to act on the recommendations. Or see if you get anything out of the reports from the yoorrook commission if you're in vic.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

Labor did nothing wrong, the voice was never ever ever going to pass unless we all got brain damage and became greens voters

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Who's denying any of that though?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Sometimes it's not even about denial of what happened, but rather a mindset that the past doesn't affect the present anymore.

I often-enough hear people saying things along the line of, well, past generations took the land but society is better and less racist now, we collectively apologised, and my family weren't even here at the time, so we have no obligation to do anything now. Almost like if my dad stole your car ten years ago, died after, and I say well I've never stolen anything in my life, it was my dad's car, this car is mine, stop complaining about the past. It doesn't make sense to start acting like equal treatment is fair after so much is stolen and so little is given back. But I know people who believe morality is that own individual behaviour, whether they are doing hurtful acts, and disregard their own position in society, how they got there and who suffered to allow that to happen.

Guilt isn't what people are asking for, guilt actually doesn't do anything useful, but rather we need people to realise that it doesn't matter that we personally didn't commit massacres and seize land, because the consequences of those acts still disadvantage current generations of the victims, and it's not resolved if we dismiss the consequences as someone else's sins.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

reckon its probably worse than that. I think people just dont care. Apathy instead of denial and hate. And thats a problem I dont know how we fix. The federal government stuffed up with the voice as well, should had their full throated support. Now people are just tired of being told to give a shit, especially since it all went nowhere.

[–] jimmy90 3 points 3 days ago

for sure get rid of the monarchy at least