this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2025
8 points (78.6% liked)

AskHistorians

719 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Lazy comedy punches down. You find a group that it’s socially acceptable to make fun of and then you do, because you don’t need a punchline.

Go back and watch some sitcoms or comedy from the 90s when it was acceptable to punch down at homosexuals. Comedians didn’t need to write the hard part of the joke, they could just do a gay lisp and the audience was in stitches. Sitcom writers didn’t need to work hard just put a character in a situation where another character would think they are gay, audience whooping and hollering.

Were these moments funny? Not really. But at the time homosexuals were a group it was ok to make fun of so people did and audiences liked it. They liked it because implying someone was part of that group was scandalous, the members of the group could be treated with derision, and it affirmed in the audience their own goodness merely by not being a member of the group.

Blackface was working for largely the same reasons. It was acceptable to mock and denigrate black people. It requires no hard thinking or creative writing to have a character slap on some blackface and act in a stereotypical fashion. Doing so was as easy crowd pleaser because it was a joke “everyone was in on” and it made the white audience feel superior.

Telling audiences comfortable jokes that affirm that they are good people is a great way to make boatloads of money. What jokes are comfortable and what makes people feel like good people changes over time and we look back and go “cringe, why the heck did we find that funny at some point?!”

[–] Patnou 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Don't know if this was not how it is to be worded or wrong use of words. If its a problem will repost after deletion.

[–] Pronell 7 points 2 days ago

You're clear enough, I think. You're asking in part why it was acceptable then but not now.

Some of it is also that the really good Vaudeville acts run by former slaves and immigrants made shitty white performers jealous, so they put on blackface to try that 'genre' of shows without being called out.

And it provided them a bit of a disguise to protect their 'normal' careers.