this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2025
777 points (97.6% liked)

Microblog Memes

6203 readers
3446 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] krashmo 36 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I like that they chose microplastics and credit scores as the indicators of a failing system. I'm not entirely sure why but they seem more fitting than just about anything else despite the fact that they're probably not the issues one would point to as the biggest problems we face. They feel relatively bland and yet overwhelming at the same time.

[–] kurwa 30 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I feel like they point to our biggest issues, capitalism and killing the environment.

[–] kautau 10 points 2 weeks ago

theyre_the_same_picture.jpg

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yeah that’s the essence of the humour on this one imo

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The idea that farming lead to more complex governments and consequently, greater inequality might be flawed. I recommend the book " The Dawn of Everything", which challenges this assumption.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It does make a lot of sense though.

It must be hard to form any society if all you do is hunt and gather and have no meaningful surplus.

Also I wouldn't say that it's a problem with inequality even if technically true. Society, centralization and teamwork of humanity has benefited our species immensely. I think that's more important than "well technically it might be more inequality".

Inequality is absolutely bad but we can't simply ignore everything else that happened since.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Just because something makes sense doesn't make it true. That is why I included the source which argues the point. Also, I am saying it might not be true. Honestly, I would more than happy to find a way to organise a govt that doesn't involve trusting politicians or bureaucrats or dictators. The best place to find would be in the past, when the human societies might have experimented with ways to organise a govt.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Just because something makes sense doesn't make it true. That is why I included the source which argues the point. Also, I am saying it might not be true.

Am not saying you are wrong or right, just that the commonly accepted theory makes a lot of sense.

Also it isn't really reasonable to vaguely state something which is contrary to common knowledge and "cite"/recommend an entire 700 page book. Imo, you should at least make concrete statements which are possible to dispute and optimally include page numbers like Wikipedia most often does. But I understand that that is out of scope of a simple comment

Also I find it a bit weird when you want a government but without politicians. Doesn't a government pretty much per definition need politicians or should the government be run like a company with a bunch of bosses or something?

But yeah it would absolutely be interesting to research how people did governments and everything else in the past. Historians

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes, it does make a lot of sense. Though, I will be happy if it gets proven wrong.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Totally! It's always great when we learn new things!

I would be surprised if it was possible to prove with certainty something human (I.e not a science) that long ago though. Or at least I think we would have done it already if there was text or anything definite to go on.

Let's hope there are some hidden undiscovered treasures of history out there, so that we may one day learn more about our ancestors.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

It definitely seems to me that surplus to do agriculture and industry creates all the spare time required to become a despot.

Computers and electronics are becoming advanced enough to where we can imagine what fully automating these things might look like. That we could probably get done the "the machines do everything we need for us and now we can spend our time painting or whatever" idea with what we have and know now. Hardening infrastructure will be the most fun part, making power lines and such ragnarok proof or self-repairing.

The problem is greed. While the human gene pool still contains people like Elon Musk, it will never be "the machines make everything we need so no one needs to worry," it will be "They're MY machines, they make things for ME, you don't have any machines so you don't deserve ANYTHING!" I'm sure this comment will be removed if I detail my solution to that problem.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Shit! Was the gorilla wrong?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I fucking hate farmers, man

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

All do is plant things on land that could be used to create perfectly good soulless housing estates, and a Lidl.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

All farmers know is receive subsidy, complain, use horrible pesticide that doesn’t work, and vote conservative. Fuck farmers.