this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2025
11 points (92.3% liked)

History

4376 readers
22 users here now

Welcome to History!

This community is dedicated to sharing and discussing fascinating historical facts from all periods and regions.

Rules:

FOLLOW THE CODE OF CONDUCT

NOTE WELL: Personal attacks and insults will not be tolerated. Stick to talking about the historical topic at hand in your comments. Insults and personal attacks will get you an immediate ban for a period of time determined by the moderator who bans you.

  1. Post about history. Ask a question about the past, share a link to an article about something historical, or talk about something related to history that interests you. Please encourage discussion whenever possible.

  2. No memes. No ads. No promos. No spam.

  3. No porn.

  4. We like facts and reliable sources here. Don't spread misinformation or try to change the historical record.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
11
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by someguy3 to c/history
 

Louisiana Purchase was $15 million in 1803.

Alaska Purchase was $7.2 million in 1867.

Inflation puts $15 million in 1803 as being $19.6 million in 1867. So that puts Alaska purchase as 36.6% the price of Louisiana purchase. Honestly I can see why it was seen as a folly when the land couldn't really be settled, crops couldn't grow there, and the value was fur and fishing. (Though yes Louisiana as seen as a bargain).

https://www.in2013dollars.com/us/inflation

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FireTower 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Somewhere there's an alt history timeline where Russia never sold Alaska and the USSR had possession of it during the Cold War.

I think a lot of the value in hindsight is just getting another world power off of North America.

[–] someguy3 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

They sold it because they knew they couldn't hold it in a war. They also needed the money after the Crimean War. In any case they would have happily sold it for money during or after WW1 or during WW2 when they needed money.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Alaska has no geopolitical significance. It was part of the Westward push toward the Pacific under Manifest Destiny trend. Hawaii supplanted any significance that Alaska was supposed to have. Alaska is the 49th state, Hawaii is the 50th US state. The Russians obviously saw no significance to have it. Even if Russia still had it in an alternative history to the present time, Alaska is so remote it would not have Russia that much more of a threat. Alaska was, basically, a disconnected Siberia to the Russians. It costed them money to occupy it during their ownership. Alaska today is a resource extraction economy. It has good fishing, it has oil, timber, and there was a gold rush. As such, economic activity will be productive, but not diversified. There are YouTube videos that exaggerate the geopolitical significance, but it is really more of an outpost.