Isn't funding cancer research "big government"?
Leopards Ate My Face
Rules:
- If you don't already have some understanding of what this is, try reading this post. Off-topic posts will be removed.
- Please use a high-quality source to explain why your post fits if you think it might not be common knowledge and isn't explained within the post itself.
- Links to articles should be high-quality sources – for example, not the Daily Mail, the New York Post, Newsweek, etc. For a rough idea, check out this list. If it's marked in red, it probably isn't allowed; if it's yellow, exercise caution.
- The mods are fallible; if you've been banned or had a comment removed, you're encouraged to appeal it.
- For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the comments.
- All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.
Also feel free to check out [email protected] (also active).
Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.
"Big government" means thinking the government is bigger and more expensive than it needs to be.
When all the government needs to do is keep me happy then any program which I understand benefits me is vital and any which doesn't is "big government"
I know we're all going to suffer, but Im particularly glad those who voted this way are slowly starting to realize how they or their love ones will.
Anxiety is the worst part about any major change
Good time to remind everyone that both parties support banning the Cuban cancer vaccines and Chinese diabetes cures from import to the US.
We need to remove the capitalists from power to get access to modern medicine for the general public.
Bitter me and Trump: fuck this guy’s health
AlaskanPolitics.. I mean, you have an account called SomethingPolitics and you didn't have a clue about that?
You get what you fucking deserve
He proposed funding cuts to the health and science research last time. They just don't remember.