this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2024
56 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

1650 readers
227 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

[email protected]
[email protected]


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

They’d also have to ask for consent before selling your info.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] actually 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Are the agencies that will cease to exist soon just trying to troll people now?

Or is this a shout for help saying they actually can do new and innovative protections, if only they are not disbanded?

This ssn protection has been years denied.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The concept of a SSN is crazy

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

As an ID number it has almost nothing to recommended it, especially compared to modern equivalents in Europe. It wasn’t meant to be a national ID number.

The only reason we use it for identification in the US is that a common ID is often useful but Americans have always been phobic to mandatory census.

Obviously they’re fine handling all that information to data brokers, however.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But some government agencies, including Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the FBI also rely on data brokers to get around surveillance restrictions.

Well, exclude those agencies. Obviously.

The best time protect personal data was 20 years ago. Why is someone just now thinking of this?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Think of the FBI!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

geeze. i thought something so sinister would already be illegal. no??

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

since they're selling all my data, i should at least be getting royalties, fuck.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

With all the breaches over the years and exposures to malicious employees, hasn't everybody's SS # become of part public record? I wouldn't want it used as a security thing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Freeze your credit

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

... unless they make an appropriate contribution to the right politician or party.