this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
20 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

1100 readers
210 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Alphane_Moon 4 points 3 months ago

“Why haven’t we seen EPYC+HBM sooner? EPYC has been focused on high volume markets, which is why you don’t see EPYC with more than 2 sockets,” Park posted on Bluesky. “You can’t swap out your DDR5 controllers and add HBM controllers/stacks and call it a day. HBM forces certain design choices (e.g., every HBM3 stack requires sixteen 64-bit channels).

“Flexibility: with HBM, you can’t upgrade capacity or have lower cost versions with fewer channels populated," he added. "Generally, CPUs don’t require that much bandwidth.”

Sounds like HBM equipped CPUs are a rather niche and specific use case. Surprised that it's not clear whether this CPU has regular Zen 4 or Zen 4c cores.