Love how hard they're trying to portray this as a bad thing lmao
this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2024
93 points (97.9% liked)
World News
32341 readers
101 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
The US is run by the capitalist class, and from their point of view China is “authoritarian,” because the Chinese state isn’t allowing the capitalist class to run China.
That’s what Western governments and Western corporate media really mean by “authoritarian” & “totalitarian” governments: that Western capitalist neocolonization is being stymied by those governments.
If the government is in control of anything, capitalists will claim authoritarianism. This is the way.
If the government is in control of anything, capitalists will claim authoritarianism.
It's more like international capital wants unfetter access to resources and labour power in China. A country doing economic or resource nationalism is the problem, not the government doing stuff. All western governments are heavily interventionists in their economies, but they do it mainly for the capitalists and especially the international capitalists, what they do for the people is for keeping social stability so that they may keep their position.
Not very freedomy or very cash money democracy of them 😠
cash money democracy
Fucking LOL
I can only read the headline but that sound to me like a very good thing though.
But at what cost 😢
Rich people. The cost is rich people.
It's the Financial Times. Taxes are a cancer for them.
When it's directed at capitalists and corporations at least