Microsoft Windows

0 readers

13 users here now

founded 1 year ago

Based on my little survey, 81% believe search has become worse with the introduction of AI. (fedia.io)

submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Based on my little survey, 81% believe search has become worse with the introduction of AI.

Do the search engine makers care or will they continue in the same direction?

IMHO, if you want to show something as the definite answer to a question, it better be right and not some AI generated stuff.

The goal for search should be to have the best possible search results. Typically AI generated stuff is not that. You would like the original information and not a rehash.

#search #AI #Computer #Windows #Linux

top 8 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

@[email protected] do I smell a Vivaldi Search feature in the works..? 👃

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

@[email protected] , no, I do not think so. I think there is a lot of search engines out there and it is a lot of work to build one.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

@[email protected]
🥥 Eye'm old enough to remember, Jon, when search results were actually helpful, interesting, and pertinent.
Of course, Eye also remember the internet before Google. 🥥

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

@[email protected] It's nevertheless a revolution. I use Copilot quite frequently. I like the conversational format and that it remembers context within the conversation. What I've noticed is that if I know or suspect that an answer is incorrect and say so, it'll correct itself and provide the right answer (and hopefully learn).
It's a net positive for me.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

@[email protected] anybody interested in other alternatives check out stract, searchmysite, and kagi

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

@[email protected]
Define: "best possible search result" ?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

@[email protected]

There is a longer answer to that, but I would think that getting what you are looking for would be that.

I remember the time when Google entered the search market. At the time, some of the leading search engines listed results based on who paid most. Google changed that, but we are in some ways back to where we started?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

@[email protected]
"what you are looking for" gives more questions than answers.

The Page ranking which built Google's early success was a great innovation for its time but would be wholly unsuitable for today's world wide web.
In some ways you are correct that we are back to who pays the most, but it's not paying Google it's that SEO has become and industry, and there is no objective measure of a website's quality.