Blind Main

473 readers

1 users here now

The main community at rblind.com, for discussion of all things blindness.

You can find the rules for this community, and all other communities we run, here: https://ourblind.com/comunity-guidelines/ Lemmy specifics: By participating on the rblind.com Lemmy server, you are able to participate on other communities not run, controlled, or hosted by us. When doing so, you are expected to abide by all of the rules of those communities, in edition to also following the rules linked above. Should the rules of another community conflict with our rules, so long as you are participating from the rblind.com website, our rules take priority. Should we receive complaints from other instances or communities that you are repeatedly, knowingly, and maliciously breaking there rules, we may take moderator action against you, even if your posts comply with all of the rblind.com rules linked above.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Unpacking Google’s new “dangerous” Web-Environment-Integrity specification (vivaldi.com)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

1 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Will accessibility tools that rely on automating input to the browser cause it to become untrusted? Will it affect extensions? The spec does currently specify a carveout for browser modifications and extensions, but those can make automating interactions with a website trivial. So, either the spec is useless or restrictions will eventually be applied there too.

top 1 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Is Web Environment Integrity a risk to the accessibility of the Internet?
- https://programming.dev/post/831937
Google’s nightmare “Web Integrity API” wants a DRM gatekeeper for the web
- https://programming.dev/post/916235
Mozilla opposes Web Integrity API proposal
- https://programming.dev/post/929260