this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2023
7 points (100.0% liked)

Red Devils

925 readers
5 users here now

All things Manchester United.

New to the community? Come say hi in the Welcome thread.

Got any suggestions on how we can improve and grow as a community? Let us know!

Basic rules:

  1. Fuck the Glazers
  2. Be civil to each other
  3. No non-Manchester United/football content. Non-United content is allowed if it affects United in some way. Otherwise, use the Daily Discussion Thread
  4. Fuck the Glazers
  5. Before posting news, please refer to the Journalist Reliability Guide
  6. Keep it legal - no streams please :)
  7. Have fun!
  8. Fuck the Glazers

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RamesesKnibs 4 points 1 year ago

Fabrizio is referring to this story by James Ducker

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Would be nervous as hell spending that much money on any 30 year old.

[–] 2000mph 3 points 1 year ago

I'm still very much 50/50 between Hojlund and Kane. They are both a gamble in different ways. Kane because of his age and cost, Hojlund because of his inexperience. However I do think Kane is still the best bet, even if he costs a lot of money he is the perfect missing piece to complete this team and mean we can actually compete now. Getting Hojlund means, although he is the better long term option, it does mean we'll have to wait a few years before being able to compete for a title again.