this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2024
18 points (95.0% liked)

Hardware

764 readers
72 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Eheran 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

New processor with higher number beats older one with lower number. In other news, new day has higher number than previous day!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Yes, but 9000 non-x3d did not beat the older version and arguably was worse in some games.

It's sad, but your statement is not a given.

[–] Eheran 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I mostly mock the stupid "obsolete". Even if it beats it, it will cost more and is less available.

[–] fulg 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If this was a YouTube thumbnail, it would also have a stupid arrow pointing to it and a mind blown (or smiling poop) emoji. Maybe some fire too? Oh, a trash bin, of course!

Sad times…

[–] Eheran 5 points 2 months ago

You won't believe what this new processor did!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

That is also also not surprising. X3D cpus have been pretty strong for games. The regular processors are for people who do not need gaming performance.