this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2024
168 points (94.7% liked)

Privacy

31609 readers
154 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The divide in these comments perfectly encapsulates why nothing ever gets done when it comes to privacy

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This thread is the worst case of astroturfing I’ve seen on this site so far, holy shit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

I dont understand the downvotes on some of these anti-signal arguments. There are a number of very valid arguments against Signal if privacy is your chief concern: they have centralised servers, they've been extremely lax with adding their production updates to their publicly available source code on github, they receive funding from RFA.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yup, would probably get more people to join by just using Discord at this point.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

You won't see previous messages, but that doesn't mean the group is dead lol

[–] autonomoususer 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Don't want Signal with randoz. Try SimpleX, easy mutli-accounts.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

Or Simplex Chat

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Would be the most appropriate in this case as people don't need to hide when talking in public groups

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Seen a lot of different opinion in this, but personnaly I would recommended this.

  • SimpleX, for the most privacy (but not really appropriate here) Wouldn't use any of threema wire and else, as it's not the best.

  • A good option in the case of this project is a matrix server, if the group is public it's the best thing. Try to host it somewhere else than matrix.org. Will have no real hiding but surely anonymously if done correctly

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah not doing Signal with randos.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

That is indeed a massive improvement, but until they allow multiple profiles per number - that would still mean either using the same account with internet randos as I do with IRL friends, or renting a whole other number and risking losing the account once the ownership of the number expires.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not usable until they support unifiedpush. I won't burn my battery with simplex.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Actually it's not burning my battery so much, but I can understand

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Why not something xmpp based? Or matrix

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Basically a app that lock you with a phone, giving you only one account. Centralized servers. Not good.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Good for some use cases. Only if the Signal Foundation stays in the current track and it doesn’t go south like with Mozilla.

For a privacy chat group with random people, maybe another app would be a bit better.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Personnaly I would recommended SimpleX for small groups and 1:1, only a bit less uglier

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Because you can't have privacy if a company asks for your phone number.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Depends, who do you want to shield what information from? Signal knows all of their users’ phone numbers. You can hide it from other Signal users. All depends on your threat model.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Right, then Signal might not be the best option. The NSA can easily track who’s using Signal, and possibly do some traffic correlation to reveal who’s talking to who.

But to state that there is no privacy on Signal at all is a bit of a stretch.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yes but, I ain't joining a random group I found on Internet on a service which has my phone number. Which can be easily traced back to me. Because I don't know who all the members are then if someone is on the list then that will put me also on the list. If it was something like matrix where even though the group could be unencrypted and open to all. I can use Qubes and whonix to make sure that some stupid idiot doesn't put me on a watchlist I don't want.

But if I know all the members and I or someone I trust controls who can join then anonymity isn't a concern security is and in that scenario yes I'll definitely be using signal. I already am. But not here.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Signal knows all of their users’ phone numbers.

Only the hash of your phone number.

[–] CosmicGiraffe 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How exactly is it hashed? There aren't that many possible phone numbers, so it might be viable to just try every valid number until you find one that matches

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Good correction, thanks

load more comments
view more: next ›