Much logic. "Not condemning" = "Celebrating" apparently. If i see two drunk people beat each other up, then im not gonna publicly condemn either of them, but that doesnt mean i think that either of them are doing something good. If he had to condemn every attack from both sides all the time, he wouldnt be able to work at all. Maybe thats the goal here. Preventing the UN from doing its job.
this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2024
69 points (93.7% liked)
Palestine
843 readers
1 users here now
A community to discuss everything Palestine.
Rules:
-
Posts can be in Arabic or English.
-
Please add a flair in the title of every post. Example: “[News] Israel annexes the West Bank ”, “[Culture] Musakhan is the nicest food in the world!”, “[Question] How many Palestinians live in Jordan?”
List of flairs: [News] [Culture] [Discussion] [Question] [Request] [Guide]
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
Iran also only targeted military sites yesterday, which is completely in line with international law. As long as they don't target population centers there's no reason to condemn it.
I'm pretty sure this whole thing is made as a way to discredit organisations, UN or otherwise, who are even slightly against the mess going on over there.
Yep, it's the classic "if you're not with us, you're against us" stance meant to threaten everyone into being complicit in your atrocities.
I'm sure you have the best of intentions but, the way you put it, seems like the "all lives matter", "men's rights" rhetoric. There's just one genocidal actor in the region, anyone acting to contain it (including non-state actors) is doing the world a huge favour.
I never get to hear about these guys dying in air strikes.
A military attack on military targets with no civilian casualties (from the attack itself), why does that need condemnation?