a11y (digital accessibility)

186 readers

3 users here now

#Introduction This community is dedicated to discussing topics around digital accessibility and disability rights. Please be respectful following the rules below.

#Guidelines No abusive, derogatory, or offensive posts or comments. No porn, gore, NSFW, or advertisements are allowed. Do not vendor spam accessibility products or events.

#Encourageent Please ask questions and share your experiences around digital accessibility and disability rights. Please be open to other views so we can engage in respectful dialogue.

#FYI I'm waiting to add an icon or badge until alt text can be added for them in Lemmy.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Thinker33

What Constitutes “Intentional Discrimination” Under The ADA? (www.tdrlaw.com)

submitted 5 days ago by Thinker33 to c/a11y

0 comments fedilink hide all child comments

This article highlights how a conservative Supreme Court could weaken the ADA. The ADA requires plaintiffs to prove intentional discrimination. Currently, there is a circuit split on what the burden of proof is. Some districts say that only deliberate indifference is required while other districts are arguing that the plaintiff must show discriminatory animus to be awarded damages. Adopting the discriminatory animus standard would seriously weaken the ADA. #accessibility

no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

there doesn't seem to be anything here