this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2024
237 points (98.8% liked)

Inhabited Beauty

521 readers
44 users here now

For photos of beautiful, still-inhabited locales! It can be a quick snapshot of your local town, a breathtaking pro photo of a city, or a pic of some fascinating piece of modern life.

The only real rule is that it must be an actively inhabited/used location (ie not ruins or natural locales). Otherwise, go wild. Anything that you find beautiful or interesting!

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
237
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by PugJesus to c/inhabitedbeauty
 

Some other pics:

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bamfic 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Rocca. Rocco is some dude in Jersey in a camisole who says fuggedaboutit

[–] PugJesus 5 points 1 month ago
[–] ownsauce 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

For anyone getting AI generated vibes like me and @[email protected]

The posted night image is heavily edited. Beyond light filters, the entire bottom center and bottom left layer was copy pasta'd to hide some dead space and a switchback snakey road. See in the bottom center, there is a white parked car that repeats itself.

Someone heavily edited the lighting, and potentially stitched together several different photos/angles to get this night image.

Here's an unedited version showing the switchback road, and the parked white car:

https://old.reddit.com/r/Townscaper/comments/l47dvv/rocca_imperiale_italy/

[–] PugJesus 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Replaced the image, thanks

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Aaah, that's what happened. Saw the previous image as thumbnail opened the post and it looked different. I must have clicked right when you changed it.

[–] ownsauce 2 points 1 month ago

Cool! I found one with the same night shot, and without the copypasta: https://old.reddit.com/r/interestingasfuck/comments/owrli9/rocca_imperiale_italy/

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Are those all houses, or are there shops mixed in? Imagine living at the bottom but having a shop at the top.

[–] CptEnder 4 points 1 month ago

I'd prefer shopping up top so I carry things downhill

[–] ownsauce 3 points 1 month ago

Never skipped leg day.

Those small villages in Italy are fascinating. Looks like there are some pathways and small roads so you could probably use a moped or a handcart to get your bigger shopping back home.

[–] NewNewAccount 6 points 1 month ago

I wonder if the city mandates a particular type of light be used. Varying use of modern LEDs with their narrow, specific wavelengths could ruin a town known for its lights.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Bellissimo!

[–] Etterra 4 points 1 month ago

So much goddamn cardio...

[–] ownsauce 2 points 1 month ago

Reminds me of Bellagio on Lake Como. So much history makes it feel magical. Some of these shots remind me of videogames like foundation. Though the narrow streets are crazy for modern things like rental cars vs lorry drivers, our rental car may have been returned with a few extra scratches on the hubcaps and scuffs on the paint.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sure this isn't Dall-E 2, "make me a city on a hill with castle on top?"

Really has that feel.

[–] bassomitron 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I get that everyone likes to witch hunt AI art as if it's the bane of humanity, but this is such an idiotic comment. You can literally Google the city.

[–] ownsauce 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The bottom layer of the photo was altered, you can see something like a parked cae that repeats itself, middle of the OP image, the two bottom layers partially repeat.

[–] bassomitron 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Altered photo, sure. But this is a famously known city and suggesting it's just an AI image is ridiculous. You can literally take 1 minute to search this city name and see countless night time images similar to this one.

[–] ownsauce 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The city is real but the image is not reality.

[–] bassomitron 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My man, it is. It's only slightly altered. Like I said, there's dozens of images online that look the same. I imagine the glitch at the bottom is an attempt to avoid auto copyright detection bots.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Do you live in the castle or something? You seem kinda personally defensive about this.

[–] Scolding7300 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think the original photo posted was heavily edited, hence the complaints. Not sure if you were looking at the newer edit or not (see other comments for context)

[–] bassomitron 2 points 1 month ago

It wasn't that heavily edited. Like I said in another comment, a quick Google image search shows tons of official photos that were shot with a similar style. It just looked like it had a long shutter exposure making the lights look a lot more vivid/bright than natural and the bottom had been altered in a way that seemed to try and avoid auto copyright detection. Anyway, people are welcome to believe what they want.