this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2024
50 points (84.7% liked)

Data is Beautiful

852 readers
1 users here now

Be respectful

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I looked at it for five seconds and I figured this doesnt work like this at all

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

oversimplification. letting out a lot of questions. leaving out why all of this is benificial at all. leaving out that science is really divided about vegan diet and its effects on health. lumping every climate, culture, agrarcultural practice in one pot.

there is no easy answers for complicated questions.

there can't be when the question isn't even clear in the first place.

take water, for example: people always talk about how farms and fields use up water. but, is that really true? water goes in a cycle. it never gets used up. if there is no pasture or field, water gets used up anyway. or do you go there to collect it? yes, its bad to taint your water soils with chemicals. but, then just don't use them?

its plants, factories, chemical industry and cities that use up the water. because thats the water you have to recycle really hard.

or, take fischeries: they are not mentioned here, not on the graphs. but they destroy our planet as well, by ships, debris from nets, overfisching, crude oil that gets disposed of in the sae, and fish and shellfish farms are the tainting your water really really bad,

or take biogas farms: they use so much land for corn that it would make your head explode, corn gets used for all kinds of chemicals, it would not help if people ate vegan, since its use is in chemical industry and energy production, so the graph doesnt mention that either.

the whole thing is oversimplification.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Its about encouraging people to make better decisions, thats what the whole point of this type of research is. Its to entice people to head in that direction and see if we are right or not, because continuing the path we have been on is diasterous at best.

It shouldnt be so hard to see the goal of this type of graphic is to stoke conversation not to force everyone into a specific viewpoint. 50 years from now veganism might be considered abusive.

Its important to move forward, because doing nothing is moving backwards. There is no such this as neutral.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

well. that attempt was kinda weak.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›