this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
13 points (88.2% liked)

cyph3rPunk

751 readers
1 users here now

The people in this community hope for a world where an individual's informational footprints—everything from an opinion on abortion to the medical record of an actual abortion—can be traced only if the individual involved chooses to reveal them; a world where coherent messages shoot around the globe by network and microwave, but intruders and feds trying to pluck them out of the vapor find only gibberish; a world where the tools of prying are transformed into the instruments of privacy. There is only one way this vision will materialize, and that is by widespread use of cryptography. Is this technologically possible? Definitely. The obstacles are political—some of the most powerful forces in government are devoted to the control of these tools. In short, there is a war going on between those who would liberate crypto and those who would suppress it. The seemingly innocuous bunch strewn around this community represents the vanguard of the pro-crypto forces. Though the battleground seems remote, the stakes are not: The outcome of this struggle may determine the amount of freedom our society will grant us in the 21st century. To the Cypherpunks, freedom is an issue worth some risk.


Relevant Links:


"Security is mostly a superstition. It does not exist in nature, nor do the children of man as a whole experience it. Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. Life is either a daring adventure, or nothing." Helen Keller

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In this report, we examine the future of voting and the possibility of conducting secure elections online. Specifically, we explore whether End-to-End Verifiable Internet Voting (E2E-VIV) systems are a viable and responsible alternative to traditional election systems.

This report contains the most complete set of requirements to date that must be satisfied by any Internet voting system used in public elections. Developed by a team of experts in election integrity, election administration, high-assurance engineering, and cryptography, the report starts from the premise that public elections in the U.S. are a matter of national security.


I think a utxo blockchain makes perfect sense as an application for this homomorphic encryption technology for use in democratic voting, and subsequent verification, and security of the vote (to protect the voter from intimidation after the fact).

In my opinion, the main problem behind blockchain voting comes when a centralized power (like the US for example) wants to understandably use their own national currency in CBDC form (digital currency) as the oil in that machine. It's a dilemma because decentralized, open source technologies must be used for a system like this to truly be secure and independently-verified.

no comments (yet)
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here