And that's why privacy people are against age verification and other verification methods that store your personal data. Idiots like this or underpaid government employees are unqualified to protect it. And they can't leak what they don't have.
this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2024
23 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
1213 readers
184 users here now
Which posts fit here?
Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original link
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
Companion communities
[email protected]
[email protected]
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
There’s a book I really like in which they have to kiss their devices since all other used biometrics are already publicly available… through breaches.
inadvertently published the passwords to its back-end database
I hate this use of the word "inadvertently". It's meant to describe a situation where someone who has caused harm could not have reasonably known the consequence of his actions. For example, parents who fed their children tainted apple sauce inadvertently poisoned their children. In theory they could have done their own chemical analysis, but it's not reasonable to personally test all food for lead.
This password was not published "inadvertently". The company could have and should have avoided doing so. The right word is "carelessly". They deserve blame.
(If you want to avoid making the company angry at you then at least say "accidentally" and leave the question of blame unanswered.)