this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2024
834 points (96.7% liked)

Technology

58123 readers
3890 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Mozilla has a close relationship with Google, as most of Firefox's revenue comes from the agreement keeping Google as the browser's default search engine. However, the search giant is now officially a monopoly, and a future court decision could have an unprecedented impact on Mozilla's ability to keep things "business as usual."

United States District Judge Amit Mehta found Google guilty of building a monopolistic position in web search. The Mountain View corporation spent billions of dollars becoming the leading search provider for computing platforms and web browsers on PC and mobile devices.

Most of the $21 billion spent went to Apple in exchange for setting Google as the default search engine on iPhone, iPad, and Mac systems. The judge will now need to decide on a penalty for the company's actions, including the potential of forcing Google to stop payments to its search "partners completely," which could have dire consequences for smaller companies like Mozilla.

Its most recent financials show Mozilla gets $510 million out of its $593 million in total revenue from its Google partnership. This precarious financial position is a side effect of its deal with Alphabet, which made Google the search engine default for newer Firefox installations.

The open-source web browser has experienced a steady market share decline over the past few years. Meanwhile, Mozilla management was paid millions to develop a new "vision" of a theoretical future with AI chatbots. Mozilla Corporation, the wholly owned subsidiary of Mozilla Foundation managing Firefox development, could find itself in a severe struggle for revenue if Google's money suddenly dried up.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ulkesh 12 points 1 month ago

So Mozilla will find other forms of funding. That’s how this works.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

quite a good chunk of that goes to their ceo anyway.

[–] vanderbilt 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I am livid over her absolutely disgraceful management over Moz. When electron was building a de facto monopoly of Chromium on the desktop she made no moves to produces equivalent tooling. While Node grew into a behemoth she totally ignored it. The only thing that has come out of Moz in the last decade that mattered was Rust, and she’s already fired the Rust team. She is poison and serves only to suck up a salary that could fund development.

Mozilla needs its wake up call and to start being the underdog that makes something worth doing. With Manifest V3 and the anti-trust case on the horizon they have a fork in the road that will define what becomes of them. Hopefully she can make one good decision and it’ll be the right one.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

Even if Mozilla survives it'll need to cut off some spendings.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Tax/fine Google more and give the profits to competitors like Mozilla (as long as those competitors use the funds for Firefox)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sounds too European for the "land of the free"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I can very much imagine this being a short to medium term issue (and still an existential threat to Mozilla), but hopefully, this improves the situation to the point that there is no future company like google who artificially maintains control over browsers and search engines, rendering competitors dependent on these massive contracts? I mean, this is what got them there, right?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] toasteecup 9 points 1 month ago

I would pay money to keep Firefox foss for other people who can't afford to do so.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This isn't a new threat. This was always a threat.

The things that give google money are the reasons why we don't want to use google. The things that firefox does to get money are basically just giving google the thing that makes them money.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›