Noob Q: why is it always anarchist vs authoritarian? Surely there's a middle ground?
Comradeship // Freechat
Talk about whatever, respecting the rules established by Lemmygrad. Failing to comply with the rules will grant you a few warnings, insisting on breaking them will grant you a beautiful shiny banwall.
A community for comrades to chat and talk about whatever doesn't fit other communities
I doubt very much that they have ever read Rosa Luxemburg. The most they pick up on is the nonsense that Luxemburg had something against the Russian revolution, which is not true.
Anarchism lacks a materialist basis. Above all, an understanding of the role of the state.
The differences between anarchism and Marxism were decided well over 100 years ago. Those works are still relevant, so it is enough to read them.
Rosa Luxemburg's writings are more closely related to Trotskyism and disagrees with the notion of a monolithic party, essentionally saying it isn't democratic enough. It's a derivative of marxism just like anarchism i.e. it doesn't subscribe to many of the ideas of leninism.
SMH. I can't wait until Hexbear federates so sectarians can have the sectarianism bullied out of them.