this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2024
34 points (92.5% liked)

Portland

300 readers
8 users here now

Welcome to the lemmy.world community for Portland, Oregon!

This community has kind of been empty since it was created, I'm hoping to change that!

Unlike "other" Portland communities you may have seen "elsewhere", I believe in a "warts and all" approach. You are free to take off your Rose tinted glasses and talk about topics that are dragging our city down.

At the same time, sunset pics, snowmageddon, traffic monster, cones, that's all welcome as well. Let's collectively keep Portland weird!

2024 is going to be an interesting year politically with all the changes to city government, I will attempt to tag political threads with a [Politics] tag and encourage users to do so as well.

Other than the lemmy.world restrictions on spam, copyrighted material, and adult material (USE that NSFW tag!), there's only one real way to get in trouble here:

  1. Don't attack other users.

It's OK to go after Teargas Ted, it's OK to say Rene Gonzales is a fascist, ACAB, BLM, whatever floats your boat (WEFYB).

It's NOT OK to attack or diminish another user. Feel free to disagree, you can point out the many ways you think they're wrong, just don't start throwing perjoratives AT OTHER USERS.

Links to know!

Portland Trailblazers Schedule!

https://www.nba.com/blazers/schedule

Portland Winterhawks Home Game Schedule!

https://www.rosequarter.com/events/winterhawks

Portland Timbers Pre-Season Starts in February!

https://www.timbers.com/schedule/matches#competition=all&date=2024-02-10

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Full bill text: https://sos.oregon.gov/admin/Documents/irr/2024/017text.pdf

TLDR; Oregon corporate tax has a minimum rate of 1%. This ballot measure would raise it to 3% and give $750 to each Oregon resident (including children).

Get ready for an Uber/Lyft level of corporate ads and media spamming to try to sink this common sense bill.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Neat, but I'd rather see this money go to improve social safety nets and public services.

[–] pdxfed 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

This is just an allowance and a start. If you want to fix safety nets, target increasing unemployment taxes and payout rates and getting single payer health on the ballot.

Social safety nets include having money in the bank, being able to buy groceries, saving a bit more into retirement because you have an extra $750 in your bank account, being able to pay for a prescription, to fix a flat tire to get to work, a baby sitter, childcare, some gas to go hiking or whatever you need to keep your head on straight...some social safety nets don't need administration, just direct payments.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Fair enough.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

It’s been scientifically proven that small amounts (by small I mean $1200-2000) do reduce poverty in a lot of cases but ummmm what are they gonna do with 750? This won’t help any homeless people. Why not just give all of the money to the homeless? Why not build affordable housing instead of giving rich people more money.

[–] pdxfed 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Homelessness is far from the only social issue of concern Just off the top of my head, I know that the covid stimulus payments in 2020 and 2021 accompanied by unemployment payments with meaningful increases through the fall of 2020 led to a historically massive decrease in child poverty in the US. Any economist, social scientist or educator would agree that the single most valuable thing we can do to improve the state of the world and reduce future problems is to invest in children's physical, social and mental health. In addition to children, people with full-time job(s), yes JOBS who still can't pay rent, or are more aggressively cutting back on groceries as they can't afford items that corporate price gouging "inflation" have rendered unaffordable in the past several years.

I agree an upper income limit would make this a more progressive tax, but considering how progressive the nature of the bill is, if the upper 5-10 % of people get $750 they won't care, but it'll mean a hell of a lot for the other 90% of folks.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago