this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2024
22 points (89.3% liked)

Movies and TV Shows

1809 readers
14 users here now

A community for entertainment industry news and general discussion about movies and TV shows.

Rules:

  1. Be civil.
  2. Please do not link to pirated content.
  3. No spoilers in the title of submissions. And please use spoiler MarkDown in the body of discussions. This is a courtesy to other users.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Just how exactly did Peter Jackson and Andy Serkis’s shocking plan to return to Middle-earth with the forthcoming The Lord of The Rings: The Hunt for Gollum come about? Let us imagine the duo kicking back in Jackson’s Hobbity New Zealand pad with a good batch of Longbottom Leaf, several cases of miruvor wine recently delivered from Lothlórien, and plenty of seed cakes and cold chicken. Conspicuous by their absence from the party, however, unless something distinctly fishy is going on, are Viggo Mortensen (AKA Aragorn, AKA Strider, AKA King of Arnor and Gondor) and Ian McKellen (AKA Gandalf, AKA Mithrandir, AKA that bloke with the pointy hat and the fireworks). Because neither seems to have been so much as consulted about the new movie before it was announced to the public.

If it turns out that The Hunt for Gollum really is about this minor segue – and honestly, how could it be about anything else? – it seems remarkable that nobody thought to tell McKellen and Mortensen what was going on, even if only to prepare them for the fact that, at 85 and 65 respectively, they might be better off priming themselves for replacement by younger actors. If that is the plan, the team behind this most unexpected new episode are probably regretting not communicating it earlier. For this week McKellen told the Times he would be quite up for starring as Gandalf once again – if he lives long enough.

This follows Mortensen telling GQ last month that he would also be interested in returning as Aragorn provided “I was right for it in terms of, you know, the age I am now and so forth”. Both actors implied they had not been told anything about the new film before it was revealed to the public, with McKellen saying he had heard only “stirrings in Tolkien land”, while Mortensen said: “I don’t know exactly what the story is, I haven’t heard. Maybe I’ll hear about it eventually.”

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I can’t even begin to explain how unenthusiastic I am about the whole thing. And I say this as a massive fantasy film nerd.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Agreed. There are a myriad of different stories they could focus on instead that would definitely draw in the crowds.

[–] Diplomjodler3 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Much as I like both, I don't think it would be a good idea to cast Mortensen and McKellen. 20 years is 20 years and I'd rather have some new actors than some crappy CGI retro-aging.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

That's fair. The least Jackson and Serkis could have done was let Mortensen and McKellen know before it went public. The way it happened just comes across as scuzzy.

[–] Diplomjodler3 4 points 2 weeks ago