Romance Books

19 readers

5 users here now

Community about romance books

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Came across an odd sentence in the Harlequin Presents I'm reading for the #TBRChallenge . It says the heroine's dress makes her look "very feminine, but hid none of her curves." (romancelandia.club)

submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Came across an odd sentence in the Harlequin Presents I'm reading for the #TBRChallenge . It says the heroine's dress makes her look "very feminine, but hid none of her curves."

Might just be a careless way of writing but it implies that the "femininity" of the dress comes from an air of modesty and that demonstrating you have curves is generally considered unfeminine. Unless you do it just right.

Weird.

@romancebooks
#RomanceBooks

top 5 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] shalafi 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think the author means in imply she had a classy look, not just hanging it all there like a TikTok thot. I'm seeing Rachael from Blade Runner.

Or for you Discworld nerds, Adora Belle Dearheart.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

@shalafi @willaful Yeah I'm picturing like a bodycon dress? As opposed to, idk, frills and florals.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

What year was the book written?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

@Dagwood222 published in 1979. English writer, I think.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

My guess would be that the writer confused the terms "ladylike" and "feminine."

A "lady" wouldn't want to look like she was showing off her body.

My vote is that it's bad writing and nothing else.