this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2024
8 points (90.0% liked)

History

32 readers
4 users here now

A community for discussing history

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 

I refer to the Reuters mischievous article, “India Hindu group toughens stance on mosque-temple disputes,” published in the Stabroek News, (28/1/2024). The article makes mention of the “razing of the Ayodhya mosque,” as the BBC, New York Times, The Washington Post, CNN, and Al Jazeera have done, without any reference to the fact, as established by the Archaeological Survey of India and accepted by the Supreme Court of India in its 2019 judgment, that the mosque was built over a huge temple.

The article further goes on to say that, “Hindu groups have for decades said that Muslim Moghul rulers built monuments and places of worship after destroying ancient Hindu structures.” This is not just a claim. The evidence for the Hindu position is evident to the naked eyes in hundreds of cases, especially in northern India where Moghul (Mongol) religious persecution – of Hindus, Buddhists, and Jains – was most intense, a persecution boastfully documented in memoirs of several Moghul rulers themselves. For example, walking around the Gyanvapi Mosque – an interesting Sanskrit name for a mosque – one can see evidence of Hindu architecture. Interesting also to note is that a mere wall separates the famous Kashi Vishwanath Mandir from the mosque.

The razing of indigenous places of worship and other institutions and superimposing on them places of worship belonging to invading and conquering armies is not something peculiar to India. Historical evidence is replete with examples in Europe where the religious landscape is littered with pre-Christian pagan monuments that were either destroyed or converted into Christian churches and cathedrals. The best, living examples of this destruction or as some Christian sources euphemistically say “conversion” can be seen in Rome and Greece.

Wikipedia is not peer-reviewed academic research, but it does make reference to something that is universally and indisputably known when it says, “Eventually the prime sites of the pagan temples were very often occupied for churches, the church of Santa Maria sopra Minerva, literally “Saint Mary above Minerva” in Rome, Christianised about 750, being simply the most obvious example. The Basilica of Junius Bassus was made a church in the late fifth century.”

The same article tells us that in Greece, “the occupation of pagan sites by Christian monasteries and churches was ubiquitous.”

On the other hand, with the rise of Islam, the first casualty was the Ka’aba itself which was once sacred to Arabian pagans and polytheists. When Jerusalem was captured the Dome of the Rock was built on the Temple Mount on which could be found the Jewish Temple. Later came the Al Aqsa Mosque. However it was in Europe that the systematic conversion of churches into mosques reached a frenzy. Alphabetically, Wikipedia lists Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Cyprus where as late as 1974 following the Turkish invasion “church-to-mosque conversion” reached a peak. In Greece, there are scores of examples of this conversion. Many other European countries suffered the same fate.

Of course, the most recent example of this takeover is the Hagia Sophia in Istanbul, formerly Constantinople. Built as a cathedral as early as 537 CE in Constantinople it was converted sometime in the mid-15th century into a mosque and remained so until 1935 when it was made into a museum. In 2020, the Turkish government declared it once again to be a mosque. All Pope Francis could do was to express “regret.” After all, Christianity was guilty of the same iconoclastic sin.

no comments (yet)
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here