this post was submitted on 30 May 2024
14 points (93.8% liked)

Privacy Guides

16270 readers
6 users here now

In the digital age, protecting your personal information might seem like an impossible task. We’re here to help.

This is a community for sharing news about privacy, posting information about cool privacy tools and services, and getting advice about your privacy journey.


You can subscribe to this community from any Kbin or Lemmy instance:

Learn more...


Check out our website at privacyguides.org before asking your questions here. We've tried answering the common questions and recommendations there!

Want to get involved? The website is open-source on GitHub, and your help would be appreciated!


This community is the "official" Privacy Guides community on Lemmy, which can be verified here. Other "Privacy Guides" communities on other Lemmy servers are not moderated by this team or associated with the website.


Moderation Rules:

  1. We prefer posting about open-source software whenever possible.
  2. This is not the place for self-promotion if you are not listed on privacyguides.org. If you want to be listed, make a suggestion on our forum first.
  3. No soliciting engagement: Don't ask for upvotes, follows, etc.
  4. Surveys, Fundraising, and Petitions must be pre-approved by the mod team.
  5. Be civil, no violence, hate speech. Assume people here are posting in good faith.
  6. Don't repost topics which have already been covered here.
  7. News posts must be related to privacy and security, and your post title must match the article headline exactly. Do not editorialize titles, you can post your opinions in the post body or a comment.
  8. Memes/images/video posts that could be summarized as text explanations should not be posted. Infographics and conference talks from reputable sources are acceptable.
  9. No help vampires: This is not a tech support subreddit, don't abuse our community's willingness to help. Questions related to privacy, security or privacy/security related software and their configurations are acceptable.
  10. No misinformation: Extraordinary claims must be matched with evidence.
  11. Do not post about VPNs or cryptocurrencies which are not listed on privacyguides.org. See Rule 2 for info on adding new recommendations to the website.
  12. General guides or software lists are not permitted. Original sources and research about specific topics are allowed as long as they are high quality and factual. We are not providing a platform for poorly-vetted, out-of-date or conflicting recommendations.

Additional Resources:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Newb question: what does it really mean when I click "Reject Nonessential Cookies"? Am I really being any more private by rejecting these? Just feels greasy like it's a workaround for websites to get my information anyway? Should I navigate away from any sites that suggest this cookie configuration?

all 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

Sites that give this option usually explain more detail about it. I pretty much always reject nonessential, since they tend to be advertising related.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I use https://addons.mozilla.org/en-GB/firefox/addon/cookie-autodelete/ and only whitelist web sites that I have accounts on.

Everything is fake crap. They pretend they care or don’t share but they can’t prove it. I assume that they are lying.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

this is the correct answer. The internet is cesspit of filth. assume that everything is spying on you by default. Mullvad browser plus VPN is a great setup for this for every day browsing

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If you're a bit pro privacy you should use a browser that reset all the cookies at each closes. So it just doesn't matter if you refused cookies or not. And you should 100% use Ublock Origin. If think that by default (or with some tweakings) it blocks most of the banners but if you're not happy with only ublock, I suggest you to try I still don't care about cookies

[–] OnePhoenix 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Thanks. I currently use hardened Firefox (Arkenfox) and yes I do use unlock.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think that even if you want to harden your Firefox you should use mullvad browser (or librewolf) and then harden it a bit if you want

[–] OnePhoenix 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I've heard of these but haven't given them a long look. What is it about mullvad or librewolf that people prefer over Firefox?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

In fact you could do every thing that mullvad and librewolf do so you should use mullvad and librewolf and if you want, harden the browser on it. In fact you don't start as low as firefox

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

it doesn't matter. you should always be using a private browser like librewolf or mullvad. trust no sites. cookie banners are nothing more than thin legal requirements that make virtually no difference to your privacy. as the other guy on here says, it means, "fuck you. use my site and ill collect your data if i can get it"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

As others said, configure your browser to store as few cookies as you can tolerate (because some actually useful stuff will break without them) and forget about these banners.

Although I do enjoy the ones that have actual usable toggles for "legitimate interests" - how nice of them, giving me an option to disable even cookies they can legally store with just a notice, and definitely not just hiding non-essential cookies into a vaguely defined category.

So I always go through the list and disable them one by one. It does nothing but waste my time, but I do it out of spite. Oh, and when I feel like really wasting my time, I send a bug report to whatever support email I can find on the site, about how the cookie banner accidentally let me disable essential cookies and should probably be fixed.