this post was submitted on 27 May 2024
26 points (96.4% liked)

Working Class Calendar

932 readers
94 users here now

[email protected] is a working class calendar inspired by the now (2023-06-25) closed reddit r/aPeoplesCalendar aPeoplesCalendar.org, where we can post daily events.

Rules

All the requirements of the code of conduct of the instance must be followed.

Community Rules

1. It's against the rules the apology for fascism, racism, chauvinism, imperialism, capitalism, sexism, ableism, ageism, and heterosexism and attitudes according to these isms.

2. The posts should be about past working class events or about the community.

3. Cross-posting is welcomed.

4. Be polite.

5. Any language is welcomed.

Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
roig
[email protected]
26
In re Debs (1895) In re Debs (Latin: "In the matter of Debs") was a U.S. Supreme Court case that, on this day in 1895, unanimously upheld the government's use of injunctions against labor strikes,... (stahmaxffcqankienulh.supabase.co)
submitted 4 months ago by roig to c/workingclasscalendar
1 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

In re Debs (1895)

Mon May 27, 1895

Image

Image: The official Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States

In re Debs (Latin: "In the matter of Debs") was a U.S. Supreme Court case that, on this day in 1895, unanimously upheld the government's use of injunctions against labor strikes, specifically the Pullman Strike of the preceding year.

The Pullman Strike was a large national railroad strike led by the American Railway Union (ARU), involving around 250,000 workers in 27 states. The federal government obtained an injunction against the union, Eugene V. Debs, and other boycott leaders, ordering them to stop interfering with trains that carried mail cars. After the strikers refused, President Grover Cleveland forcibly ended the strike with military force.

Debs and four other ARU leaders were arrested and charged with violating the injunction. After the Supreme Court sided with the government, Debs was sentenced to prison and the ARU dissolved.

In re Debs contributed to a widely held belief that the Supreme Court was simply a tool of the wealthy and big business - for the next 40 years business interests hostile to labor unions found the courts willing partners in suppressing strikes through injunction. This practice ended in 1932 with the Norris-La Guardia Act.

top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NateNate60 6 points 4 months ago

The Fuller Court (US Supreme Court during the tenure of Melville Fuller) was pretty known for its interventionist stance against socially progressive economic policy. It started the so-called Lochner era, a period of extreme liberal (in the classical sense) interpretation of the Constitution, where the Supreme Court essentially used "substantive due process" as an excuse to dictate economic policy to the political organs of the state by striking down worker protection laws.

This didn't end until Franklin Roosevelt, arguably the only social democrat elected as president, threatened to pack the court through the Judicial Procedures Reform Bill 1937. The Supreme Court backed off in the case West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish, which upheld a minimum wage law in Washington.