this post was submitted on 25 May 2024
89 points (88.0% liked)

Cool Guides

4685 readers
2 users here now

Rules for Posting Guides on Our Community

1. Defining a Guide Guides are comprehensive reference materials, how-tos, or comparison tables. A guide must be well-organized both in content and layout. Information should be easily accessible without unnecessary navigation. Guides can include flowcharts, step-by-step instructions, or visual references that compare different elements side by side.

2. Infographic Guidelines Infographics are permitted if they are educational and informative. They should aim to convey complex information visually and clearly. However, infographics that primarily serve as visual essays without structured guidance will be subject to removal.

3. Grey Area Moderators may use discretion when deciding to remove posts. If in doubt, message us or use downvotes for content you find inappropriate.

4. Source Attribution If you know the original source of a guide, share it in the comments to credit the creators.

5. Diverse Content To keep our community engaging, avoid saturating the feed with similar topics. Excessive posts on a single topic may be moderated to maintain diversity.

6. Verify in Comments Always check the comments for additional insights or corrections. Moderators rely on community expertise for accuracy.

Community Guidelines

By following these rules, we can maintain a diverse and informative community. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to reach out to the moderators. Thank you for contributing responsibly!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

So, this is an attempt to simplify the known links in the history of human evolution and it's pretty good as a starting point for learning more about it... but it also presents it in a way that encourages the idea that evolution follows some form of linear progression from one major species to another, and from simpler to more complex forms only (e.g. that evolution has a direction or makes "progress"). This is really bad and leads to a lot of misconceptions and misunderstandings.

I feel like this kind of presentation is similar to the Bohr atomic model in that it's sort of an easy way to start visualizing and thinking about the topic, but not really an accurate representation of how it works. It will be necessary later to explain the shortcomings of the presentation... which unfortunately leaves some people feeling that they were "lied to" during the initial teaching. It's not that it's "wrong" per se, but that it's simplified to a point that it creates problems.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

Everything after 430 Ma ago was a mistake. We need to go back.

[–] bored_boar_onboard 4 points 5 months ago

This is really neat! It makes me wonder about all the different evolutionary branches that didn’t persist over time or leave a fossil record.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

Damn we lost a third eye?

What a shame