this post was submitted on 12 May 2024
12 points (92.9% liked)

Civil Aviation

239 readers
1 users here now

News from civil commercial and noncommercial aviation, videos, discussions, and more.

Basic rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No posts about military aviationAvoid any and all posts related to military aviation.
3. No meme postsNo meme posts. Those should go to [email protected].
4. Instance rules applyAll lemmy.zip instance rules listed in the sidebar will be enforced.

Icon attribution

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Several Boeing models make use of serrated engine nacelles, or chevrons, to reduce noise, but Airbus doesn't - here's why not.

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

The article talks a lot but never gives us a simple answer.

[–] Dettweiler42 5 points 6 months ago

It's a customer option (hush kit) for certain engine types, and it's supposed to reduce exhaust turbulence, thus reducing noise. However, it's usually the high pitched whine of the compressor that most people hear. Most companies don't want to pay for it unless they're required to fall under certain sound levels for certain airports at night. For those, it's often cheaper to not fly that route at night, or use a quieter airplane (such as a CRJ or ERJ with GE CF34 engines).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Every design is different, and every design choice has advantages and penalties. In short, Airbus doesn't use them because of increased fuel consumption, since they found other ways to reduce noise.