this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2023
5 points (100.0% liked)

Amateur Radio

660 readers
2 users here now

General amateur radio (ham radio) chat, questions, and news

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

@w0odl
Saw that and was reminded we used to share those frequencies with the news wires.

But they are also used for airline oceanic ATC,
Selcal, so many uses….
I worry.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

@w0odl This is an interesting development. Will have to read through the petition. In the meantime, it's a reminder that perhaps our HF #hamradio bands aren't as secure as we might thinnk.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As long as corporations view it as a way to make more cash, it will never be safe. I'm really hoping the ARRL does what amateurs are paying it to do, and fight this tooth and nail. Sadly their track record doesn't give me hope at all.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

@Dusty @kb6nu Keep in mind that ARRL is limited by the amount of money we give them. It's less than a drop in the bucket compared to what Verizon et. al. can pay for influence. Is this the fault of the ARRL, or the fault if the people that elect corruptible shills?

The ARRL's track record is not a sign of failure by the ARRL. Given the resources they have to work with, and the willingness to cheat their adversaries possess, and our ability to elect criminals, they've been performimg miracles.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In this case, their time may be better spent finding allies with interests in stopping yet another ratcheting up of high-frequency trading, and the market volatility and unfairness that it creates. There are some deep-pocketed investors (pension funds?) and well respected economists that will be able to tug on the FCC's ears better than the ARRL ever could, provided the ARRL can encourage them to do so.

Those types would normally be only concerned with the FTC, but in this case, they can make good cases to the FCC that this particular use of the spectrum has no public benefit.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And those are the types of excuse that keep them from even trying. "Well you didn't pay us enough, so we aren't going to even try. By the way, your cost of membership are going up, because membership numbers are plummeting. Totally not our fault though."

People (like me) are pretty fed up with the hands constantly being shoved asking for more, while getting less and less for what we give.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

@Dusty This is what entitlement looks like, folks.

Seriously. If you think blaming the ARRL for being up against a corrupt and entrenched monopoly makes sense, you're a fool. I'm sorry to be blunt, but there it is.

Representation is not a zero-sum game where you get exactly what you pay for. This is why our democracy has come so close to failing-and you're part of the reason why.

Yes, I just said that. Think very carefully before you reply, please. For all of our sakes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Let’s take this down a notch. Please refer to rule number 1

Be respectful of others

While not a mod of mastodon.radio, I want this to be civil.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@w0odl Unfortunately, I can't. If someone wants to treat the ARRL as the inept perpetrator of our current state I can't stop them, but I WILL say it's classic victim-blaming.

I AM being respectful. I have attacked no one based upon who they are, and the person claiming I was is wrong.I won't sit around and let people attack the only collective voice we have on false pretense-if that offends you, that's a YOU problem.

ARRL is our voice, and a reflection of our commitment to our hobby.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

“I AM being respectful.”

It’s just not the case. It’s ok to voice an opinion but we can do so in a manner that doesn’t attack other people, and you did in my opinion.

“This is why our democracy has come so close to failing-and you’re part of the reason why.

Yes, I just said that. Think very carefully before you reply”

That’s a threat.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Personal attacks. That's the end of the conversation for me.

And threats as well with the "think carefully before you reply". Great way to have a conversation.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

@kb6nu @w0odl
In support of high frequency trading. Is that a public good?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

not in the least... these encrypted transmissions only benefit the traders. making more wealth for the wealthy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

They've been doing this on a STA for some time now and there have been no interference complaints. It's a not a big deal now, but could lead to other industries wanting to do the same thing. Could turn into something to worry about at some point.

load more comments
view more: next ›