this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2023
19 points (100.0% liked)

Moving to: m/AskMbin!

1325 readers
1 users here now

### We are moving! **Join us in our new journey as we take a new direction towards the future for this community at mbin, find our new community here and read this post to know more about why we are moving. Thank you and we hope to see you there!**

founded 1 year ago
 

I wouldn't. Immortality sounds miserable to me.

top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (4 children)

There are arguments which state that when you “transfer” consciousness, there is no continuity of consciousness, meaning we are at best making a copy and destroying the original. While your copy would wake up as though nothing happened, the original you gets destroyed in the process and never actually gets to enjoy the transference.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd much rather be a Ship-of-Theseus cyborg, replacing malfunctioning bits one at a time.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Such a good movie, makes me want to watch it again. RIP Robin.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

This 100%. It's also why teleporting like in star
Terk isn't really teleporting. It's a weird version of cloning. So while a version of the consciousness goes on the original basically died.

[–] xilophor 1 points 1 year ago

My favorite game that touches on this subject is SOMA. It's an amazing horror game

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

This. That's one of the dilemmas with making clones of people. It's already hard to pinpoint that exact integrity of a human (cells are constantly changing) and replacing them altogether just doesn't make sense anymore. Pragmatically speaking, it won't benefit you at the slightest, but, provided your clone is the exact copy, your friends might not see the difference. Even still, would they still be your friends whilst knowing the "true" you is gone?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It would depend on what kind of robot I'm being transferred into...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Agree. If it was indistinguishable from my meat bag body, then absolutely! If there was significant reduction in my senses, I would consider it but would probably want to stay in my human body as long as it was viable. If there was like contemporary VR where it's just visual and audio but no taste or touch or smell... nah dawg. I think that would be more akin to eternal torture.

Actually, maybe I would agree to the robot body under condition that someone wake me up every 100 hours for a few days. I would like to time travel to the far future and see how human society develops over time, but living through all that time as just a brain that can watch TV is not worth sating my curiosity.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, the robot has tentacles.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also, is the immortality mandatory, or do I get to decide when it ends?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

A volcano can fix these types of immortality

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I'm already a robot, merely one made of biological, somewhat self- repairing components, which unfortunately are very difficult to replicate in any way besides procreation, and distinctly non- trivial to switch out even when a replacement is available. If the only thing changing is the ease with which failing parts can be replaced, then he'll yes i would. I think any sane person would, or at least should. The only reason to say no would be the assumption of certain things associated with robots as stereotyped in media, but not necessarily specified in the actual question.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

depends on the fine print.
it really depends on the fine print.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

definitely, that is why i said no to be 100% sure haha

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Yes. I would love to upload my consciousness. I'm not going first, but if the opportunity arose I would certainly do it

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Immortality means no obligations to complete tasks by any deadline, which means I'll never get anything done and will procrastinate until the heat death of the universe. I'll stick with the flesh body, thanks.

[–] jake_eric 4 points 1 year ago

At the end of my life I may as well. Better than dying, right? Probably, at least.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Nope. I have my doubts if it'd be immortality for me or a separate consciousness that believes it's me. The distinction wouldn't matter to literally anyone except me, but where it matters, it REALLY matters.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why not? If the meaninglessness of existence gets too hard, I can just turn myself off anyway, right?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

i really hope thats the case. but knowing people, it would be hard to do that. maybe they will find ways to duplicate you and do experiments or torture for entertainment. feels scary to me

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Sure, as long as I can control my own on/off switch for immortality.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Immortality? Probably not. Transfer? Probably also no.

Yes, if it were just my brain in a resilient robot body that can take care of my brain. Particularly with nerve connection (though contextual) and being able to exist in different forms easily (different sizes/environments, buildings, digital presence). Minisub or anything in space sounds like a fun time.

VR head-space too, particularly as a personal thing for down-time (use computer, practice skills, AI personality consultation), not a digital-real-estate thing.

If it were an option (no problem of money/law) I'd sign up for cryonics testing. Though I'd definitely want an anti-dystopia contract (hopefully with some science+pro-people+pro-environment institution) and probably wouldn't want my brain to be revived in USA.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Honestly? No. I want my death, eventually. I imagine if I did do it, I'd wind up going stir crazy before long, especially once everyone I know has passed away.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Yes, but let's be real here. That would be for the 1% of the 1% only.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Yes. Without a second thought.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
load more comments
view more: next ›