this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2023
25 points (100.0% liked)

Major League Baseball

1398 readers
1 users here now

A community for fans of Major League Baseball and it's teams.

Rules:

  1. No Discrimination of any kind (Racism, Transphobia, Homophobia, etc.)
  2. No Harassing. (Belittling someone's favorite team, Name-calling, Doxxing.)
  3. No Spam (Reposting articles someone else has already posted)
  4. No Porn.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Anybody wanna discuss?

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ggfunk 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Really feels like the right move is to eliminate the pairs and just take the top 4 from the first round.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

For real. Why isn't that the case? We can end up with a champion who hit fewer homeruns.

[–] Bird_Lawyer 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

4th matchup - (7) Rodriguez vs (2) Alonso

Rodriguez: 41 🤯

Alonso: 21

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] MetalFingers 5 points 1 year ago

Pete had no chance but he did not do great lol his pitcher didn’t help

[–] flatplutosociety 1 points 1 year ago

It's a double edged sword that the batter who goes first is so punished by the format. On the one hand, Julio hit almost twice as many as he actually needed to to advance, and going that hard in the first round clearly took a bit of a toll on him and negatively affected his second-round performance. But on the other hand, it was absolutely awesome to see him just unload like that in the first round, holy shit.

[–] MetalFingers 3 points 1 year ago

Julio vs roberts jr pls

[–] Bird_Lawyer 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

2nd matchup - (8) Rutschman vs (1) Robert Jr.

Rutschman: 27 (21 LHB + 6 RHB)

Robert Jr.: 28

[–] Bird_Lawyer 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Bummed for my boy Adley. Mad respect tho for the switch hitting performance. He showed out.

Adley with the 3rd most and is eliminated, that’s the drawback of a bracket format.

[–] average650 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah, the bracket format is not good for getting the best winner. But it is fun.

Though, it's almost too fast. They hit another ball before the first goes over the fence.

[–] rusfairfax 2 points 1 year ago

I went both days and the only things people were talking about on day 2 were JRod’s 41 (of course, it’s Seattle) and Adley’s switch hitting performance. Winning doesn’t seem to matter as much as showmanship and wow-factor. For the HR Derby, I’m good with that.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Adley's dad threw him several junk pitches. I wonder if he cost his son the round.

[–] Bird_Lawyer 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

3rd matchup - (6) Guerrero Jr. vs (3) Betts

Guerrero Jr.: 26

Betts: 11 (oof)

[–] MetalFingers 6 points 1 year ago

That was a little sad to watch lol I didn’t expect Mookie to win but 11 is a bit rough

[–] Bird_Lawyer 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Final matchup - (6) Guerrero Jr. vs (5) Arozarena

Guerrero Jr.: 25

Arozarena: 23

[–] Bird_Lawyer 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Semifinal matchup 2 - (7) Rodriguez vs (6) Guerrero Jr.

Rodriguez: 20

Guerrero Jr.: 21

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

can't believe vladdy got him 😦

[–] Bird_Lawyer 4 points 1 year ago

J-Rod blew his load in round 1.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It should definitely be based on most hr total, and not this round nonsense.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Definitely agree

[–] Bird_Lawyer 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Semifinal matchup 1 - (5) Arozarena vs (1) Robert Jr.

Arozarena: 35

Robert Jr.: 22

[–] Bird_Lawyer 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] flatplutosociety 2 points 1 year ago

Bummed for my boy Julio, but Vladdy's cool and I'm happy for him.

[–] Bird_Lawyer 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

1st matchup - (5) Arozarena vs (4) Garcia

Arozarena: 24

Garcia: 17