How can you claim that a negative is obvious if, to express it, you need to acknowledge its positive axiomatically to have something to subject to negation? Doesn't the very act of positing such a claim make it less obvious than if it were simply left unsaid?

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)

What

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Don't play innocent, it's you who's claiming to obviously not be a banana. I'm asking: Isn't that denial suspiciously specific?

[–] Limeey 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think you’re confused… the video author is Vlad, he didn’t mean Putin…

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That goes without saying, pretty much all undercover bananas, and not only those, are fans of Vlad.

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'm not claiming anything, obviously not.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Exactly what one would expect a banana to say in this situation.

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana 4 points 9 months ago

🚫🍌

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

This was amazingly insightful. Thanks for sharing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I hope that decades of passivation had left masses incapable of being radicalised and militarised and this plan will fail (that is if Putin's plan is that). But time will tell and this hope may be in vain

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

@sukhmel @barsoap
Millions of hate-filled Americans have been radicalised by the insane politics of Washington and the US media. Unfortunately, most Americans don't think think that this isn't a problem.