this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
20 points (95.5% liked)

Selfhosted

40400 readers
763 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I have a self hosted media server, and I want my family to use it more so I don’t have to do everything for them. I think the best way to do that is to have a wiki available on the local network where they can see a reference of how to use things. What is the best way to accomplish this?

I’m running Ubuntu Server.

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Check out Bookstack. It's a brilliant piece of software that gets out of your way and has a modern look and feel that your family members will like and appreciate. The challenge will be to get them to use it instead of going straight to you. They may find themselves inconvenienced by having to go to a self-help resource. That's a them problem and not a you problem though.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

+1 for bookstack. Dokuwiki is also a good choice if you want something simpler, but it also doesn't look as nice.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If you have docker installed then you can easily use WikiJS

[–] chandz05 4 points 1 year ago

++for WikiJS!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sadly, still no clipboard pasting of images

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe in v3 🤷🏻‍♂️

I hope that there will be an update soon

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I like Wiki.js but updates seem slow and not all that feature packed either. It's had placeholders in the admin side of things for what seems like forever.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree and this is what was critisied the last time on his blog. See the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The comments are interesting and yeah, it's very much looking like one of those passion projects that'll never see the light of day at this rate.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hope that it will get a release this year. On GitHub there is activity visible

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah but barely, just look at the releases. It's all bug fixes as if it's on maintenance mode.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Checkout the branch "vega". This is v3 and there is a little bit more activity, but yes, it could be more

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I use dokuwiki for years now. It’s not that pretty but it works well. No dark mode though afaik

[–] valen 2 points 1 year ago

Dark mode can be done by changing the template. You can install a new template, or there's an admin panel to change the colors, and you can get dark mode that way. But it's true that there's no dark mode for some and light mode for others option.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I'm currently running Dokuwiki as a Docker container, which has a built-in editor, good admin web-ui panel, easy ways to add multiple users, and also baked in access control rules so some can edit certain pages. It is also flat-file so no storing plain text in a database, so you can backup and migrate easily.

There are a lot of alternatives, but Dokuwiki is quite mature, and has that familiar Wiki look that your family might appreciate, rather than it looking like boring/corporate software documentation.

[–] ilovecheese 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've been using Tiddly Wiki for years now.

It's just a single file, so no need for a dedicated container!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I remember using tiddly wiki a long time ago. Do you still prefer it over other solutions? I feel like my tiddly wiki would be too large of a file by now to be manageable, but I'm not really sure.

[–] ilovecheese 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's only a few hundred pages and still works well enough I haven't felt the need to move to anything new.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What're you using to sync your TiddlyWiki? From your last comment, I started playing around with tiddlywiki again and the first hurdle I ran into is how to sync it between multiple devices. https://noteself.org/ looks interesting, but doesn't seem maintained anymore.

[–] ilovecheese 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't actually sync it, I have it on my LAN web server along with my home page etc...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you use the nodejs server or something else to save updates? I guess tw calls them savers. I'm trying the nodejs version now and it seems alright, the auto saving is a lot faster than I was expecting

[–] ilovecheese 2 points 1 year ago

I use the store.php method. Works fine for my use case.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

It really mostly depends on if other family members will need to edit the wiki.

  • If they'll be only reading dokuwiki might be best - even a single frontpage with all the info nedded.
  • If they will be editing then bookstack is way more friendly for non-technical people as is had a full WYSIWYG editor and you don't have to bother with markdown.
[–] ruud 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

run it at work. I would say it bit too heavy and too much for home usage.

load more comments
view more: next ›