I mean...the state does have legitimate things to hide beyond their spying programs. Not every person that spills government secrets is as careful as Snowden.
this post was submitted on 29 Feb 2024
1330 points (96.9% liked)
Privacy
31235 readers
1306 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
Chat rooms
-
[Matrix/Element]Dead
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
Government always tries to establish as much power imbalance as possible
played well.
Except that the government doesn't claim that it has nothing to hide. On the contrary, it has official rules about hiding things. It's not hypocrisy to say that governments have a need for secrecy which is different from that of a normal individual.
I have rules about hiding things too. A couple of them are not having creepy weirdos trying to spy on me when I'm making love to my wife, or listening in on deeply private conversations behind closed doors. But for some reason certain people seem to think we don't deserve that essential liberty now, despite it being guaranteed in the Constitution.
I'm not necessarily disagreeing with you. What I'm claiming is that the fact that a government, even a good government, needs to have secrets doesn't have much bearing on the argument for an individual's right to privacy. That doesn't imply that there's no individual right to privacy.
The individual does have an essential and legal right to privacy though, the 4th Amendment of the Constitution clearly outlines that. The corporations and the government want to pretend that violating those rights through digital devices we own isn't a violation of the Constitution, when it very clearly is. Snooping through our cloud documents, scanning text messages, or activating a camera or microphone on our phone is no different than sneaking into our homes and going through our paperwork, reading private letters, and installing a hidden microphone and camera. Just because something is digital doesn't mean that it's exempt from our rights. The digital world is every bit as real as the physical world for people who are online.
And yes, of course governments have a genuine need for privacy, as do private and public businesses. The point of the post isn't to say they don't, it's to say that we do too and their hypocrisy is bullshit.
I'm waiting to be told its in the terms and conditions you agreed to when you purchased the phone and activated the service. We're at that level of dystopian now.
Memes r duamb