this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2024
41 points (97.7% liked)

UK Politics

2864 readers
399 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both [email protected] and [email protected] .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

[email protected] appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Lee Anderson? The MP Lee Anderson? The MP Lee Anderson who got caught faking an interview? The MP Lee Anderson who thinks the death penalty has a 100% success rate? The MP Lee Anderson who thinks people so destitute that they have to use food banks just can't budget properly? The MP Lee Anderson who was investigated into claims he is antisemitic? That Lee Anderson?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That's the one. The 30p Lee that presents on GB News.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Politicians shouldn't be allowed to present on a channel with "news" in the title.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I believe ofcom almost agree too...

“No politician may be used as a newsreader, interviewer or reporter in any news programmes unless, exceptionally, it is editorially justified. In that case, the political allegiance of that person must be made clear to the audience.” (Source: https://www.ofcom.org.uk/news-centre/2023/ofcoms-rules-on-politicians-on-tv-and-radio) But what we see here is these programmes being billed not as news, but as talk shows or current events programmes which allows them to sidestep this. An example of an article which lists a series of complaints being investigated by ofcom as of September 2023: https://www.thenational.scot/news/23799032.full-list-gb-news-shows-investigation-ofcom/ Note:This is from The National, an outlet which is very anti-Tory and I'm sure subject to a few impartiality complaints itself!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

But what we see here is these programmes being billed not as news, but as talk shows or current events programmes which allows them to sidestep this.

They literally rely on their own blog post to take that position, it's not what they rules they have been given state.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago

I think Lee Anderthal should be investigated by the police for his comments.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

Anti-Muslim hatred has become normalized in the UK.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Notice how he was stripped over the whip because of the comments of Sadiq Khan, and not the comments of Lee Anderson. Odd that.

[–] scholar 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

No, his comments regarding Khan, not Khan's response

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

No it was absolutely his response. Our ust while MP wouldn't have done anything about it it hadn't been a backlash, he's pathetic

If he had any spine at all he would have also removed the whip from Truss as this is the second far right convention she's been to, a convention in which one speaker spoke about overthrowing the legitimate government of the United States. So she's now openly declaring an open desire to disrupt democracy in the political process of an ally.

[–] scholar 1 points 4 months ago

You're right, but this is still Anderson's fault, not Khan's.