UAP - The Most Active Community Discussing UAP/UFOs

1247 readers

44 users here now

A community for civil discourse related to Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena. Share your sightings, experiences, news, and investigations. Everyone is welcome here, from believers to skeptics and everything in between.

New to Lemmy?

See the Getting Started Guide

Want Disclosure?

Declassify UAP offers a tool that automatically finds your representatives and sends them a prewritten message.

Community Spotlight

Useful Links

Community Rules

Follow the Code of Conduct.
Posts must be on-topic.
No duplicate posts.
No commercial activity.
No memes.
Titles must accurately represent the content of the submission.
Link posts must include a submission statement (comment on your own post).
Common Question posts must include a link to the previous question thread if previously asked.
Low effort, toxic comments regarding public figures may be removed.
Off-topic political discussion may be removed at moderator discretion.

Other Communities

[email protected]

If you're interested in moderating or have any suggestions for the community, feel free to contact SignullGone or HM05_Me.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

SignullGone

HM05_Me

Karl Nell on The Schumer Amendment And Controlled Disclosure (www.youtube.com)

submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by HM05_Me to c/uap

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 5 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] HM05_Me 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I was eagerly awaiting the Sol Foundation videos to post. Most importantly that of Karl Nell, retired Colonel US Army and former Deputy Chief of Staff, US Africa Command. Nell gives a breakdown of legislation, how UAP classification has been kept from Congress, guidelines of what constitutes UAP, and the overall impact of disclosure.

The basis of his presentation revolved around the formation of the former Schumer UAP amendement and timeline for disclosure. And, while the Schumer Amendment was stripped of some its strongest components (review board, eminent domain, etc.), the fundamentals are still in place to kick off controlled disclosure of UAP. This should serve as good basis for where we're at with potential disclosure and potential progress made in coming years.

More videos from The Sol Foundation's conference can be found on their YouTube page.

[–] paraphrand 3 points 9 months ago

It’s good to see these actually got posted. It woulda been quite the boondoggle if they just disappeared.

[–] zanzo 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

On the Pros/Cons slide there is mention that the US may be losing the UAP race. My thoughts went straight to the Alaska UAP shoot down during the Chinese ‘balloon’ incidents.

[–] HM05_Me 1 points 9 months ago

That event stays on my mind thinking about the current state of the topic. It seemed to be a turning point in how the government was addressing UAP. David Grusch had already spoken to the ICIG and provided info to Congress, though I don't know that he spoke directly to any member of Congress. However, the sightings and shoot down last year seemed like the turning point. It either reaffirmed something they were already suspecting after Grusch came forward or it showed that they really don't know what's going on. And, to your comment, Grusch has mentioned adversaries possessing or researching UAP.