btrfs

112 readers

1 users here now

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

tell me your experience using zfs/btrfs (lemmy.ml)

submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

1 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/9319044

Hey,

I am planning to implement authenticated boot inspired from Pid Eins' blog. I'll be using pam mount for /home/user. I need to check integrity of all partitions.

I have been using luks+ext4 till now. I am ~~hesistant~~ hesitant to switch to zfs/btrfs, afraid I might fuck up. A while back I accidently purged '/' trying out timeshift which was my fault.

Should I use zfs/btrfs for /home/user? As for root, I'm considering luks+(zfs/btrfs) to be restorable to blank state.

top 1 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] seaQueue 1 points 1 month ago

Make a VM and play with both. I prefer btrfs on client machines because I find its snapshot and subvolume handling simpler and easier to perform common tasks, btrfs resource consumption is lighter as well. Where data integrity is critical (NAS, backup storage) I run ZFS.

You won't really understand either filesystem until you spend a decent amount of time using it so I'd practice now rather than on your important data.