this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2024
48 points (94.4% liked)

Games

16457 readers
1540 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 31 points 8 months ago (4 children)

I can't remember the last time a review embargo was placed on a game, or when major outlets didn't get review code - and the game turned out to be okay.

It's a tale as old as time, and particularly egregious this time round with the late-notice addition of Denuvo.

I mean, die hard fans won't mind either way and good on them, I hope they enjoy it - but for others who pre-ordered the game, I suppose you're only getting what you deserve.

[–] samus12345 16 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Doom 2016 comes to mind. No early review copies but it turned out to be a good game. It's very much an outlier, though.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Oh cool, that's an interesting factoid.

I suppose at least we had the open beta programme with Doom though - granted it's not review code by it's very definition, but it was something tangible to see that it was going to be not shit at the very least.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

factoid

"factoid" doesn't mean "fun little fact", it means "Something unreliable that gets repeated so much, people think it's true".

[–] samus12345 8 points 8 months ago

Here's a factoid for you: it can also mean "fun little fact" due to it being used that way so much.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Well there we go, every day's a school day!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

yeah i remember zenimax not sending review copies but dont remember if they did it with any other higher profile games

[–] Gamoc 11 points 8 months ago

Basically all games have review embargoes. If you're lucky it's before release and you get the code even earlier, but there's almost always a date you can't publish before.

The issue you're looking for is not sending code out before release so that there are no reviews at launch, so they get more people buying it blind instead of consulting a bunch of negative reviews and deciding not to.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's a huge part of why I don't pre-order games anymore. If I wait a few days, I can get a pretty good feel for if the game is worth my time (relatively bug-free, fun, etc). Best case scenario, I avoid a dud and save myself time and money. Worst case scenario, I play a good game a few days after everyone else.

So, don't pre-order a game until reviews you trust are out. Being a few days late won't wreck your enjoyment of a good game.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

The only review you can definitively trust is your own. No commentary playthroughs are abundant on YouTube. If you can’t scan through and find a fun mechanic in the first 20 minutes, the game isn’t worth playing, in my opinion.

[–] Bimfred 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Hi-Fi Rush last year. No review copies, since the game was announced and released on the same day. Turned out to be a really fun rhythm action game.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That's hardly an embargo, that's just an extreme version of "not having a crazy hype-campaign"

[–] Bimfred 0 points 8 months ago

I'd say it still counts, since the question was about review embargoes OR no pre-release copies provided to reviewers. Hype or no hype, you'd still be asking gamers to buy it based on nothing but previews, trailers and/or developer rep.

[–] samus12345 29 points 8 months ago

WB Games didn't send out any review copies because they know the game is ass and early reviews would only hurt sales.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago

Yikes. That's how you know it's bad. 😬

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Isn't this always online? Because they just added denuvo as well which seems pretty dumb if it's already always online.

[–] samus12345 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Apparently they're adding an offline story mode after release, so I guess they're hoping the Denuvo won't be cracked before then? The best DRM they have is the fact that the game won't be worth pirating.

[–] CluckN 5 points 8 months ago

While our previewer was optimistic about the potential of the story cutscenes and character builds he got a taste of, he ultimately left that session less impressed than he hoped he would be. Maybe the full game will fare better!

Even without the review copy they find stuff to make fun of.