Futurology

1560 readers

337 users here now

founded 11 months ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

New Theory Suggests Chatbots Can Understand Text | Quanta Magazine (www.quantamagazine.org)

submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Since it's been a controversy on here a couple times, here's a great example of how you can demonstrate an LLM can produce something it can't have seen before.

It doesn't prove anything beyond doubt, but I think these kinds of experiments show to something like a civil law standard that they're not merely parrots.

all 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (3 children)

They may indeed develop linguistic skills at deeper levels, but LLMs are still only playing with words. Imagine a kid who grew up confined in a library with unlimited books, but no experience of the real world outside, no experiments with moving about, bouncing balls, eating, smelling, seeing, hearing, interacting with others, only reading - might write eloquently but have no 'common sense' of reality. To train a real AI with physical sense and capabilities would be like bringing up a kid - messy, not easy to automate, takes a long time.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

we're still early in development, we just got surprised by how good statistical language modeling alone is

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I mean, I've never seen a toucan, or even been close to one to my knowledge, but I feel like I understand them pretty well, at least at a basic level. I've also never known any bird except through smell, sound, touch, sight and so on.

They do still suck at physical tasks, and probably will until we find a totally different approach to the problem than brute gradient decent, but I'm not so sure that makes everything else they (appear to) know useless. I'm not convinced kinetic knowledge is the only kind.