this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2022
0 points (50.0% liked)

Mozilla Controversy Exposed

88 readers
0 users here now

Scandalzilla is a community created to show people the history of Mozilla and to talk about controversial decisions they made.


Community Rules

  • Stay on the topic or considering opening your own thread.
  • No trolling, keep emotional outbursts to yourself.
  • Absolute no hate allowed. Discuss things on a civil manner or let it go.
  • Fanboys and disrespectful people are not welcome. Accept opinions and history how it was and not how you want to see it.
  • Claims must be backed up with evidence or minimum some references.
  • Good faith questions are allowed.
  • No conspiracy theories, this includes baseless accusations.
  • Do not suggest or undermine this community by suggesting other products, this is not the purpose of this community, we only point out problems with Mozilla or ask questions, nothing more.
  • Do not abuse the report function if you disagree in something. Abusing the report function results in ban.
  • Consider to ignore specific user(s) or block this entire community in your Lemmy Settings if you entirely disagree.

Reference


If I find a better logo I add one. Not really happy with the current one. Suggestions are welcome.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

When vice-presidents of Mozilla were asked, along the years since it was signed, what was the exact content of the contract signed with Google, all of them answered "I don't know. I havent read it."

Who in the world read the contract Mozilla and Google signed together?

Who has a single clue of what has been in there? And subsequently how can we trust Mozilla in such conditions? How didn't it doom itself to never be in a position to compete meaningfully with Chrome, buying itself time and/or a comfortable mattress of $$$?

Who can tell the Google+Mozilla contract DOESNT contain the following:

  • Firefox shall never include adblock technology as a default
  • Firefox shall always "feel lucky" with Google
  • Firefox shall always "phone home" to Google with "safe browsing" etc.

How can we know the billion $$$ of Google didnt serve to make sure that Firefox would never be the browser that th people actually need to protect themselves against.... Google?

no comments (yet)
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here