this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
12 points (100.0% liked)

Denver Post Comment Section

313 readers
48 users here now

A place for ex-pats from the Denver Post comment section (closing down in July), as well as people that want to discuss Denver Post articles in general.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CharlesDarwin 8 points 1 year ago

Too bad donnie isn't being arrested as well.

[–] Thorosofbeer -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I thought we determined that you're not liable for what happens if you post someone's address on line?

It will be enlightening to watch all the people who supported posting the addresses of Supreme Court Justices online now crying over this.

[–] AFaithfulNihilist 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The supreme court decided that it was perfectly ok to dox people and only decided to raise a stink about it once someone decided to use their decision against them and dox them.

If the supreme Court didn't want people showing up at their houses they should have protected the privacy of people with the law instead of clutching pearls when the decision they made in court to not protect people's homes from protests came back to bite them.

They didn't protect everyone's privacy so they deserve to have people show up at their houses. It was actually deliciously ironic that those corrupt little shits on the court had the temerity to complain about people posting their addresses online at all.

[–] Thorosofbeer 1 points 1 year ago

You're making my point. If it isn't a crime to post the address of a Supreme Court justice then it isn't a crime for Trump to post Obama's address.