this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2024
500 points (91.8% liked)

Fuck Cars

9875 readers
5 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 96 points 11 months ago (5 children)

You forgot the homeless people, forced to live under that interchange because you know, america, freedom etc...

[–] [email protected] 20 points 11 months ago

If they are lucky enough that nobody installed some hostile architecture there to keep them out.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 43 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Duh, moron, the future is you just live in the car.

You cant legally park it anywhere near anything useful for survival, and gas is expensive and so is car insurance.

But thats fine because cars and car companies have more rights than people! Or something...

What I am saying is anyone who walks to the grocery store /deserves/ to get run over.

Natural Selection mannnnn!

inhales

Alright, feelin good, got beer in the glove compartment, time to film my magnum opus:

DeathRace 2024.

YEEEEEHAAAWWW!!!

immediately peels out, doesnt see other driver blowing a red light until too late, swerves to avoid and crashes into the weed dispensary, paralyzing himself from the legs down and killing 4 others

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

In many cities, people are literally living in cars that don't run, in public parking spaces, because it's the only enclosed place they can afford to live in.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

Yep, and that is almost always illegal, and such people almost always end up having the car towed, having to pay for the car being towed, losing all their possessions and then becoming homeless.

Its just a matter of time until enough people report it and the police get around to it.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Capitalist wet dream right here

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

cue America Fuck Yeah! song

[–] BradleyUffner 39 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (27 children)

This isn't a great argument. There is so much open undeveloped space in the US that could be used to house people. This interchange isn't taking space away from anyone. There are lots of good reasons to reduce cars, but this isn't one of them.

[–] [email protected] 92 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (45 children)

That’s not really true here though. This is in the middle of an urban area, not in some big open empty space that’s unoccupied, like Montana, or North Dakota. This is in the middle of Houston, Texas, a very populous city.

load more comments (45 replies)
[–] Anarch157a 28 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I think OP's argument is that the interchange is a symptom of low density urban sprawl and all the associated maladies that come with it.

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] ChicoSuave 19 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Yeah, but you can't get to the other side of Siena in 20 seconds? Efficiency isn't pretty.

/S (big a for big sarcasm)

[–] Maganra 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Ah Houston, not a whole lot to like about living here.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago

bUt wE hAve EnoUGh sPaCE!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Well damn start building apartments in the empty parts. Its not that difficult to understand.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

With 6inch thick windows or intolerable noise pollution, sounds great. I wonder which one penny pinching developers are going to build.

load more comments
view more: next ›