this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2024
2 points (100.0% liked)

Major League Baseball

1379 readers
2 users here now

A community for fans of Major League Baseball and it's teams.

Rules:

  1. No Discrimination of any kind (Racism, Transphobia, Homophobia, etc.)
  2. No Harassing. (Belittling someone's favorite team, Name-calling, Doxxing.)
  3. No Spam (Reposting articles someone else has already posted)
  4. No Porn.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
2
What do you think is worse for baseball? Owners who spend much more than league average or owners who don't spend any money? (self.mlb)
submitted 8 months ago by runwaylights to c/[email protected]
2 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

With the recent spending by the Dodgers and last year the Mets and Padres, it got me thinking. What's worse for baseball? Owners who spend much more or owners who don't spend even though they're in the window like the Orioles and Mariners?

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RedWeasel 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I’d probably go with the not spending enough. MLB could really use a minimum payroll. It would probably make the league more competitive overall. Both extremes are bad though.

[–] flatplutosociety 2 points 8 months ago

I'm a Mariners fan, so I'll bet you can guess which of the two bothers me more.