@SirFredman So the Big Bang may be more than 14 billion years ago, even endlessly ...?
this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2023
22 points (100.0% liked)
Science
13337 readers
22 users here now
Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
I don't think it would change the age of the universe as measured from the inside since with slower time a year also ends up being longer. From an outside perspective it would be older though.
to me that just makes no sense - I mean there's probably some kind of math-evaluation that said so, but... uh...
slower compared to what? It's not like you can take a stopwatch and look how long a second feels.
Time "now" isn't fixed either - move closer to a black hole or just move faster and your time becomes slower - COMPARED TO THE REMAINING UNIVERSE.
But you'll only notice when you return and compare clocks. Back then, when everything was faster, there wasn't something to compare to? So nothing was faster?
From the article:
“If you were there, in this infant universe, one second would seem like one second – but from our position, more than 12 billion years into the future, that early time appears to drag.”
They are comparing to time now. If you assume a quasar expels stuff at the same rate through all time, then when you look far back in time you should see pulses coming from the distant stars at the same rate as now. Yes, that light took billions of years to get here but the pulsing rate should be the same.
They found that it isn't, it's five times slower, which implies that time then must be five times slower than now.
expired
So 5 days would be 1 day. And 50 years would be 10 years. Fucking hell. Time seems like an inanimate illusion, but is infact so real and fascinating
view more: next ›