this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2023
79 points (98.8% liked)

World News

39380 readers
1978 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

MOSCOW, Dec 27 (Reuters) - Russia and India have made tangible progress in talks on plans to jointly produce military equipment, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said on Wednesday, after talks with his Indian counterpart Subrahmanyam Jaishankar in Moscow.

all 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I’m always surprised to read the news and see India preferring the Russian partnership over that of the West.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

It’s Modi. Many consider him to be essentially the Indian version of Trump, with all that implies. Including the suspicious Russia ties.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think it's prefer one over the other. For India world is not binary. There is a reason it's called third world country, Russian partnership doesn't meant distance from West and western partnership doesn't mean distance from Russia. India doesn't have the luxury to pick sides. It has to keep engaging all global partners.

[–] holdthecheese 1 points 1 year ago

I think it also means that all countries keep it at arms distance. Playing Switzerland has advantages and disadvantages.

[–] reddit_sux 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

West has not been a dependable partner to any country in Asia or Africa.

Russia though is a bully, is a local bully and has bloodied his nose in his bullying rather than other way round. One thing that has never happened is that it has never vanished.

[–] ForgotAboutDre 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Your off the mark on this one. India (it's government at least) is more aligned with Russia ideologically. They want to be the powerful bully and they want to oppress minorities. The west has movements similar to this, but they aren't so entrenched and the path against them is much clearer.

India isn't aligned with the West. They also don't want to align with the West. Any current cooperation is much like the west being allies with the Soviet Union during world war 2. It's based on immediate convenience. Largely against china. Despite this India is actively hostile against the west in numerous ways, most recently political assignations in Canada and attempts in USA.

I think this confusion arises because India's recent history is tied to Britain. So we associate India with western alignment. However, being colonised is going to create resentment and mistrust with the colonisers and their associates.

[–] reddit_sux 0 points 1 year ago

You are also ignoring the US support to Pakistan against India, support to China.

Disregard to the allies when their job is done, vis-a-vis Afghanistan, Vietnam, Iraq.

US is not innocent of the same crime it blames Russia of. Waging war on false pretenses or do we disregard the Iraq war.

[–] Dead_or_Alive -1 points 1 year ago

There is some speculation that those assassinations were a small group of extremists within India. The assassins didn’t really fit the part of assassins and they were so easily foiled in the US.

It’s one thing to take pot shots at US allies. It’s entirely different to assassinate US citizens on US soil. Not even the USSR at the height of the Cold War considered doing that.

Biden made this issue a top priority and has spoken directly with Modi at the G20 summit. More than likely the Indians will quietly offer the ringleaders up for extradition and trial in the US/Canada and the issue will go away. The Indians still want Western tech and investments, assassinating leaders of groups who haven’t been influential for 20 or more years seems very short sighted.

If the Indians continue down this path then I think relations will probably change significantly.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

So the whole thing about colonization is actually not a biggie for India after all?